Sunday

The Haunted Bookshop


Charles Dickens: The Mystery of Edwin Drood (1870)


And the crack in the tea-cup opens
A lane to the land of the dead

- W. H. Auden [1]

1

We’d been having another argument. I was too lazy around the house, apparently. She was too controlling and wouldn’t let me do things in my own way, in my own time.

Even though you know even while you’re having them that these bitter disputes are actually about something else, not the subject under discussion, that doesn’t make them any easier to endure – or work through.

This time I decided my best bet was to go out and let the air clear before trying to reach some compromise position. So I flounced out of the flat in high dudgeon, and was halfway down the stairs before she realised I was gone. Not something I’m proud of, in retrospect, but at the time it seemed the best way of avoiding saying something truly unforgiveable.

It was late morning, and the shops were all open and doing good business. The flashy, successful ones on the main street, that is. Go a block or so back, and you start to find a layer of less glamorous businesses – the ones which seem to breathe an air of defeat in advance.

It doesn’t really seem to matter what exactly they sell, whether it’s sheepskin soft toys, greenstone ashtrays and other tourist trinkets, or assorted junk in the guise of antiques. You feel desperation oozing from their windows – one last chance at redemption before bankruptcy looms.

I tried to stay in the main street, with the people, but somehow they didn’t match my mood. I found myself slinking down one of the brighter restaurant arcades till I reached the retail equivalent of Skid Row. That was my place in life – for the moment, at least.

Some of the junk shops had books in them – not prominently displayed, but in small cardboard boxes beside the door, or even arranged properly on shelves inside. They tended to be wildly over or under-priced, depending on your point of view. Paperbacks could be as little as two or three for a dollar. Hardbacks were sometimes as much as twenty or thirty.

I had some memory of once having found a nice book in one of these shops: an edition of Apollinaire’s poetry, in the original binding, displayed (naturally enough) for its aesthetic appeal rather than the contents. Ever since then, I’d been looking in vain for a similar windfall.

I must have spent half an hour or so poking around in various shops, and was beginning to wonder when I could give up the pretence of being otherwise occupied, and nerve myself up to go back to choke down a few slices of humble pie. But then I saw it.

The shopfront was quite unobtrusive. I could see how you could walk past it without really noticing what was there. I must have done so many times, in fact, as it was right in the middle of my usual route through the second-hand shops. But – seen just from the right angle, with the right glint of the sun on the glass, you could just make out a few letters inscribed on the window: ANTIQUARIAN BOOKS.

But was it open? Perhaps it was one of those mirages – those premises that exist solely for the purpose of sending out obscure, exorbitantly priced titles to an international clientele. There was no ‘open’ sign on the door, and the catch didn’t seem to be working.

Unless there was some trick to it. There was! When I twisted the doorknob the other way, it seemed somehow to click, then engage. It opened and I walked in.




My first impression was of chaotic profusion. There were bookcases on all sides, overflowing with volumes. Not just garish paperbacks, either – solid hardbacked tomes: even collected sets in long rows, old library-bound treasures.

There was a way through them, just barely – unless you paused for a moment to think about it, that is. But it left me feeling uneasy, as if I’d invaded some sanctum. Just then, however, a singular presence materialised before me.

At least, he must have come from one of the side alleys, since one minute he was there and a moment before he hadn’t been. I wondered, in fact, if – seen from above – the sinuous lines of bookcases traced some kind of pattern, some Chartres-like maze of corridors converging on a single symbolic point.

– Can I help you?
– Well, yes, I certainly hope so. You are open, aren’t you? I mean, I can come in and have a look around?

He looked a bit doubtful at that, then brightened up as if something amusing had occurred to him.

– Of course, sir! You’re only too welcome. Is there anything in particular you’re looking for?

That question is generally a trap. The smaller the range of stock in a bookshop, the more likely its proprietor is to ask if you have anything specific in mind. And the leaps of logic they go to in finding cognate books is amazing, at times: although also somewhat depressing. In a shop as extensive as this, though, I thought it might be worth taking the risk.

– Well, I’m very fond of poetry. Do you have any books in that line?
– Poetry? Old poetry? Or the newer kind?

He frowned in contemplation.

– I think I’d better take you there, as it can be a little difficult to explain our layout. It’s meant to imitate a human mind: with the harder, more analytic subjects associated with the left side of the brain over there, and the right brain subjects to do with the more intuitive, humanist arts over here.

I didn’t quite know what to say to that, so I followed him down the curve of the bookshelves towards the right of the shop.




Oh. My. God!

I’d never dreamed of anything like this. The shelves that he brought me to were overflowing with poetry of all eras.

There were wonderful seventeenth century books with ‘f’s’ for s’s’ and fulsome dedications to aristocratic patrons at the front. The poems seemed mostly to consist of dialogues between shepherds and shepherdesses on the supposed obduracy of the latter to the former’s requests. Most of the author’s names were unknown to me, but I recognised Marvell and Vaughan and one or two other Eng. Lit. stars among them.

Then, with the shift to the eighteenth century, the books became fatter and more multi-volumed. Satires on city life and the decay of modern morals now began to prevail. Until, that is, the outburst of the Romantic era, when foreign travel and the gods of Greece and Rome burst in to sweep all before them.

On and on and on. There were earnest volumes of 1930s functionalist poetry in praise of the Machine and of its historical embodiment, the Party. There were 1940s New Apocalyptic paperbacks. There were 1960s Beat Era pamphlets with crudely stencilled collages and assemblages of concrete poetry.

But what did these volumes cost? I could see no prices pencilled inside them, and I’ve learnt long since that it’s most unwise to ask unless you’re very dedicated to buying the book in question at almost any price.

There’s something about bookcases set up in rows that leads you inexorably on to the next shelf, the next book. It’s a little like that gingerbread house which so beguiled Hansel and Gretel – you start off with the breadcrumbs and end up with the sweets.

Cruising the stacks, we used to call it when I was at College. Most of the university libraries I’ve ever had the pleasure to browse through were arranged just like this, in long, inexorable rows which attracted your eye away from the book you were ostensibly looking for – its catalogue number hastily scribbled on a convenient scrap of paper – to something exceedingly apposite in the next shelf.

So, too, here. The poetry section was, to tell the truth, a trifle overwhelming. I couldn’t really conceive of a place to start in so comprehensive a collection of rare editions.

But then some modern novels caught my eye. Graham Greene. Ho-hum. But some of the titles looked a little … unfamiliar. The Quiet American, yes; England Made Me, yes; but what of The Name of Action, or Rumour at Nightfall? Those weren’t books I remembered seeing before. But when I started to leaf through them (first editions, of course) they had all the hallmarks of real books – signs of wear on the pages, and other books by the same publisher advertised in the endpapers.

Greene has never been precisely my cup of tea. All those protracted, strained theological scruples, awkwardly soldered onto slambang action plots. It was, admittedly, a little petty of the Nobel Prize committee to deny him the literature prize for all those years in favour of such luminaries as Pär Lagerkvist or Marguerite Yourcenar, but one could rather see their point, at times.

But Greene led on to other things. More and more novels, some in wonderfully bound sets of complete works, others in their original three-decker form. George Eliot, Thackeray, Trollope … Dickens, of course. So much Dickens. Biographies, letters, bound-up sets of the original parts of some of the longer novels. And there it was: The Mystery of Edwin Drood.

Not that there’s anything particularly surprising about that. Ever since he died with only three of the twelve planned parts of his final novel in print, and enough material left over for three more parts, Edwin Drood has been the abiding obsession of Dickens enthusiasts.

It’s all so good, that’s the trouble. From the madness of the first chapter, where John Jasper wakes up in an opium den, to the spectral precincts of Cloisterham Cathedral, it’s intensely atmospheric even by the standards of other late works such as Great Expectations or Our Mutual Friend.

But this seemed to be a copy of a complete novel! Not the truncated text we’d all become accustomed to. Not that I didn’t know that there had been continuations of his work by various people. One late nineteenth-century effort was actually supposed to have been revealed to its author through spirit messages! Perhaps the most famous of these is Leon Garfield’s. Certainly he’s the most stylish among the various continuators (if that’s a real word).

But this wasn’t that. Nor was any collaborator mentioned on the title page. So far as I could see, this was just one more Dickens novel, only the text in these pages was, strictly speaking, impossible.

Was it a novelisation of some kind? There had been a few movies and even some TV adaptations, I knew that much. Perhaps a written-out version of the famous lost BBC miniseries of 1960? No. This certainly appeared to be a genuine Victorian novel: not a later imitation.

I had to have it. Armoured in the invincibility of my VISA card, I started to make my way towards the centre of the shop where (presumably) the sales counter must be located. And yet it wasn’t.

Normally you can steer by the sides on such occasions. Once you hit one wall, you’re bound to encounter a corner if you follow it far enough. One corner leads to another, and eventually to the exit. Not in this shop.

For a start, the walls were unreachable (if not invisible). Thick drifts of dusty books piled up on the floor blocked just enough of the aisles to angle you only in certain directions. If those other book bays were reachable, it could only be through some mysterious backdoor route.

The size of the place, too! It must have been a warehouse of some kind in a previous existence, since no normal retail premises could possible require so huge and unfocussed a space. Could there be so large a building, existing unseen among all the other, more familiar shopfronts along this back street?

But when you’re lost in a maze of shelves, there’s really nothing for it than to go forward. And so I did. The day must have turned overcast outside, as the shadows certainly lay long and dark on some of these corners. Nor was it possible for me to dismiss entirely the strong impression I had that some of them were … occupied.

I did try calling out once or twice, but I felt a certain diffidence about attracting too much attention. Perhaps this shop was really a front for some more nefarious occupation – perhaps these dark recesses were just as unsafe as they appeared.

Until finally I emerged. There it was, the counter. There was an old cash register on it, and a bearded old gent standing, beaming, behind it.

It wasn’t the same person I’d met coming in. That man had been younger, more suave – less dusty overall.

This one looked far more cheerful, though – almost Dickensian in his demeanour. One might have identified him as one of the Cheeryble brothers if it weren’t that he was on his own.

– You’ve found something, sir?
– Yes, I have. This book.
– Ah, Edwin Drood. A nice clean copy. Not a first, but quite an old edition nevertheless.
– Is it really the whole novel? I mean, I thought only part of it had survived.
– Only part of it? Oh no, sir, this is certainly complete. There are no pages missing. The spine is intact.

Curious though I was, I didn’t want to draw attention exactly to the superlative rareness of my find, so I subsided.

– A guinea suit you, sir?
– A guinea? You mean two pounds? What would that be in dollars?
– In dollars, sir? I can’t imagine. Perhaps ten?
– Ten dollars? Do you accept plastic?
– Ten dollars will do it, sir.

I began to see my windfall drifting away. Time to settle without further ado. Did I have ten dollars? Surely I must have that in change, if not an actual ten dollar note.

I began to shovel out some one and two dollar coins onto the counter, as he watched me with a slight air of puzzlement. Was he not used to modern money? Had he never encountered it before?

Finally I’d piled up ten dollars in coins. He poked at it gingerly.

– All that to make ten dollars! Well, I suppose it’s all right.

He began to shovel it into the cash register, then – as I stared myopically into the recesses of the glass case behind him: could that really be a multi-volume set of Henry Torrens’ Arabian Nights? – started to parcel up my novel in brown paper, topped off by a little string sling sealed up with wax.

– How beautiful! It’s nice to see that old way of wrapping up books – so much better than a carrybag …

He looked a bit startled, but pushed the end result of his labours towards me, as I prepared to beat a hasty retreat.

Luckily for me, leaving the bookshop was far easier than navigating its interior. I could see a gleam of daylight in front of me, and managed to follow it out to the front door. It tinged behind me somewhat hungrily, I fancied – as if it had missed out on some anticipated feast. Roast customer!

Never mind. Even if I never quite dared to return there, I had my prize. I’d seen perhaps the greatest bookshop of my life, and had bought a rarity which would undoubtedly repay much further gloating – not to mention investigation.


2

Except that it didn’t. Repay investigation, that is.

As soon as I got home, I went into the study to have a thorough trawl through my new book. Which turned out to be fool’s gold. The back read quite simply: Edwin Drood and Other Stories. It was just a reprint of the truncated portion of Dickens’ half-finished serial, with a few other bits and pieces which had appeared in periodicals here and there during his lifetime.

But that was not how it had looked in the shop.

I’d anticipated a certain asperity from Margaret when I’d first arrived home. I did, after all, go out with our differences unresolved – and, indeed, largely unexamined.

But with the book on my mind, my only desire had been to unpack the parcel and rifle through its contents.

Fortunately it turned out that her mind was on quite different things. I’d managed to sneak all the way into the flat, leaf through the book, and digest my own disappointment, before I heard her voice outside the door.

– Oh you bad thing! Naughty!

I certainly was a naughty bad thing. A pretty accurate overall description, I thought. But it just seemed a bit out of character to hear her use the phrase. She was not usually so … roguish – on occasions such as this, at least.

Nor did her words sound as if they were particularly addressed to me. They were audible from where I was sitting, yes, but I couldn’t imagine her cajoling me through a shut door.

Sure enough, when I went out to see, there was Margaret with a towel on her lap and – somewhat bizarrely – a baby’s feed bottle in her hand, nursing a little bundle of fur on her lap.

A baby’s bottle? I hadn’t even realised we had such a thing. Certainly there’d been no need for it down the long years. But there it was, being wielded determinedly (if inexpertly) by my long-suffering, longtime partner.

– What’s this?
– What do you think?
– It looks like … a kitten.
– That’s right. That’s what it is. A kitten. He came to the door and he’s so hungry.
– Does he have a collar? Is there a telephone number?
– No, no collar. I’d say he’s been away from home for a while. His coat’s very rough, and I think he’s got fleas.
– Hadn’t we better ring the vet?
– What, to have him taken away?
– No, no, to have him checked out. He may need medicine. For that matter, his owners may live just round the corner for all we know.
– We’re keeping him.
– You can’t say that. We don’t know where he comes from.
– We’re keeping him.

The kitten, largely preoccupied with the novelty of sucking at a feedbottle, had remained largely silent up to this point. Now, however, he lifted up his little head and gave vent to a burp, followed by a funny wheezing sound.

I’d heard that it could take cats quite a while to learn how to meow, and that they mostly did it to communicate with humans on what they thought was equal terms. Certainly this one looked terribly young and fragile.

I bent over to examine him more closely, and he put out his little paw. That was it. That was enough. There was something about that little gesture which made him seem so alive, so self-contained and wilful that I immediately fell in love.

The coup de foudre! I’d heard of such things, had experienced my share of passion for other humans, but never had I felt the bastions of my heart fall so thoroughly to the ground at a single stroke.

I could see that Margaret was reluctant to give up holding him cradled on her lap, so I contented myself with bumping paws with him. He seemed to enjoy it. Certainly his bright little eyes seemed fascinated by all the wondrous new sights and sounds all around him.

Can we? Keep him, I mean?
– Why shouldn’t we? He came here. I’ve fed him. He wants to stay.
– But …
– But what? Wherever he was living, they clearly haven’t been taking care of him. He needs food, and cuddles, and lots of attention.
– He’s beautiful.
Isn’t he?
– That little black nose, those white stripes on his face.
– Yes. I think he’s the most beautiful thing I’ve ever seen.
– Me, too.

And so it was settled. I don’t know if Margaret felt any misgivings. I certainly did. A kitten! Right in the middle of town, with all those motorcars and hazards, in our tiny flat. Would we have to walk him on a leash? What if he ran away?

The terrible truths of a hostage to fortune began to dawn on me. From now on, from this moment till the end of time, I would be continuously worried about the safety and happiness of this little creature.

He seemed so helpless! And yet he’d clearly been fending for himself, out there, in some random gutter. Had he tried to get in through other people’s doors? Had they turned him away? How could they? Certainly Margaret was a bit of a soft touch at the best of times, but opening the front door to find such a gift from God must have seemed like the answer to all her prayers at that moment.

He was so furry! Before us stretched a sea of troubles, but from now on history would have to be divided into two epochs: BK and AK: Before Kitten and After Kitten.

– What shall we call him?’ I asked. Actually, do we know if he’s a ‘he’ or a ‘she’?
– Oh, he’s a ‘he’ all right. She lifted him up. Look at those big splay paws. Even if …
– Even if he hasn’t been spayed.




We did learn some more things about him at the vet’s, a couple of days later. His little operation went off quite easily. I tried to justify it by thinking that what you’ve never experienced, you don’t miss, but I still felt uneasy about it.

More to the point, he did have fleas – tons of them – and we went away with a flea comb and a treatment to be put on the back of his neck.

The vet guessed his age at no more than six weeks or so, and gave as his opinion that he’d probably been abandoned by someone passing through, perhaps as a result of the flea infestation (never a pleasant thing to encounter while driving home from a holiday).

He might have been on his own for a few days, but not much more than that, he felt.

– Quite frankly, he wouldn’t have survived. He’s clearly been brought up by a mother who showed him how to use a feeding bowl and a litter box. If you do install a cat-door, and I’d strongly advise it, you’ll probably find that he already knows how to use it.

It was somehow reassuring to know that he was now, officially, listed as ‘ours’ – though actually the sentence should probably have read the other way round. We were now his, wrapped round his little paw, and anxious to smooth every bump in his bustling little life of jumping, scratching and cuddles.




He just seemed to sicken. After all that running and jumping in the first few days, he grew more and more listless.

We took him back to the vet, who was at a loss what to do. He suggested an x-ray – pricey but informative – to check out the kitten’s internal organs.

We agreed unhesitatingly.

When the results came back, a short time later, they were indeterminate. There was nothing obviously wrong, but there were a couple of suspicious looking dark spots on the lungs. His best guess was pneumonia.

By now we were beside ourselves. Whatever the solution, we were ready to implement it – drugs, operations, you name it. But it turned out that there wasn’t really much we could do except try to keep him calm and quiet.

Fat chance, I would have said just a day or so earlier. Now, however, he simply lay in his little faux-fur cat bed, his big eyes hooded with fatigue.

It killed us to do it, but in the end we had to agree to have him put down. It was cruel to keep him suffering when there was clearly no road back for him.

Did it bring us closer? I’m not sure. We both shed more tears in those last couple of days than we’d probably ever done in the whole previous course of our lives.

The vet suggested adopting another kitten straight away – or possibly two to make it seem less of a betrayal of his memory. We couldn’t face it, though. It wasn’t the idea of having a kitten which had attracted us, it was him – his personality, his sweet little face and big splay paws.

So intense had been those few short weeks surrounding his coming and abrupt departure, that they seemed almost like a time out of time, a section of life which could be soldered off and consigned to history.

It wasn’t long before you’d have thought we’d entirely forgotten it, so few were the references to his life and death. We were careful to bundle up all of his toys and towels and beds and donate them early on, so there was little tangible evidence left.

And I have noticed in the past that extreme emotional stress of this type is often instinctively corralled off by your body’s own processes. It foresees damage – or so I presume – from further exposure to this source of pain, so it cuts off your mind’s access to it.

It wasn’t so much that we became emotional zombies, as that our brains rerouted all traffic down different paths.

Which is perhaps one reason why it had taken till then for me to start to examine fully the curious circumstances surrounding my visit to that strange antiquarian bookshop.

When it comes to the comparison between kittens and books, even I have to admit a prejudice for thinking about the former. But now that that was forbidden to me – or rather, absent from the list of topics to think about, by order of some shadowy general management committee – it came back to mind.

But when I went back to find the shop, you probably won’t be too surprised to hear that it was gone. There was no real evidence it had ever been there, in fact. I tried to retrace my steps that day, and God knows there were few enough streets it could have been in. Nothing. Not even any blank warehouse frontages that might have stood in for it.

Nor was the book itself available for me to check. I’d looked through it cursorily on the day he came, but only enough to establish that it wasn’t the bibliographical anomaly I thought I’d seen in that strange bookman’s paradise.

Where was it now? Had I shelved it carelessly in some out-of-the-way part of the study? Margaret denied ever having seen it, let alone tidied it away in any paroxysm of housewifely zeal. Nor did I feel I could press the point, in her present state of emotional prostration.

Why did it matter to me, anyway? Was it purely the distraction which made it nag away at me day after day? Something to fix the mind on that wasn’t small and furry?

Or was it the threat of something wrong in myself? Some mental shunt or bypass which was making me see things, misread simple title pages, and generally create illusions and hallucinations out of thin air?

I tried rereading a book I’d once bought on hallucinations, but found it the reverse of comforting. The author pointed out the immense commonness of such mental disturbances, and the unreasonable association between seeing things and serious mental illness: until recently such manifestations were regarded as definitive proof of psychiatric disturbance.

But what he couldn’t give me was any explanation why I would suddenly start to manifest a complete system of apparitions in the form of a phantom bookshop, an impossible book, and a series of faux-Victorian personages at this late date in time.

If I’d been seeing things all along, and had gradually learned to deal with it, like so many of the patients mentioned in the book, that would be different. Or if I’d suffered some kind of mental or physical trauma to bring it on, that too would make a certain strange sense. But I hadn’t.

The trauma had all come afterwards, in the form of our delightful little visitor.

And then, what about him? Where exactly had he sprung from? His advent did seem suspiciously serendipitous, diverting us totally from any other thoughts or preoccupations. Had it all been, somehow, arranged? And if so, by whom?

When I repeat them now, these thoughts sound quite crazy. But at the time they seemed anything but. And certainly the circumstances were odd, outside my quotidian reality, even if others might have been better suited to taking them in their stride.

Without further data, further speculation was fruitless. I’d visited a strange shop and bought a strange book there. We’d found a stray kitten and adopted him. But then he died. Those were the facts. Simple, impregnable, and yet replete with doubts, fears and suspicions.

I tried to spare Margaret most of these speculations after one unhappy attempt to explain to her just what was on my mind to make me look so distracted. I’d have done better just to say that it was the memory of our little friend. I’m afraid that she found the existence of any other motives in me not so much a necessary mode of deflection as a callous disregard of the central facts of life.

But it was driving me mad! Without a sounding board, your thoughts go round and round in your head like a pinball machine.

Who did I know to share such conjectures with? Nobody. But wait, what about …? No, I haven’t talked to him in years. Do I even still have his address and contact details? It turned out, by some curious chance, I did.


3

But before I go into all that, let me backtrack a little.

I had a dream that night. It was odd. I was back in the bookshop, but this time it was more of a general purpose junk emporium. The aisles were filled with ceramics and car manuals. Something for everyone, in other words.

There were some books, still, but rattier and less elegant than the ones I had seen.

The thing that impressed me most was the puppets, though. There was a whole section devoted to those, and some of them were quite unbelievable. There were Japanese samurai dolls, complete with articulated armour and inscribed ceremonial swords. There were Punch and Judy dolls – hanging from their hooks with all their macabre companions: the Policeman, Death, The Baby, the Butcher …

And there were elaborately made-up two-headed wooden Rajasthani puppet dolls (or that was what the label said, at any rate).

These latter seized my attention most of all. I took down a couple of them (they came in pairs), before discovering they could be reversed. You could turn them upside-down, twist around the head, only to find that the elaborately coiffured female doll was also a bearded male doll. The dress, too, reversed to become his long flowing warriors’ robes.

This led to certain difficulties in display, as only a single facet of their character could ever be on show at any one time, which is why (I suppose) they were ticketed as having to be sold as a couple. One male and one female half could be up for a while, only to be reversed every second day, perhaps.

Just why this obsessed me so was not quite clear to me when I woke up. In the dream everything had seemed crystal clear – some profound truth coded into these dual-sex dolls – but such concepts felt far less meaningful to me in the light of morning.




The friend that I mentioned above, my old university buddy Phil Drake (known as ‘Dick’ to his intimates – not because of any silliness in his disposition, but because most of us were rabid Alt Sci-fi fans), was certainly the person to ask about matters such as this.

A storehouse of miscellaneous information, he had the disconcerting habit of failing exams because of a tendency to go off on tangents at the drop of a hat. All you needed to do was mention a word, and that would be it.

That one word ‘Rajasthan’, for instance, would have led to a long disquisition on the foundations of Romany culture, historical speculations about the place of origin of these so-called ‘gypsies’, and the clues which had led modern scholars to postulate an origin for these enterprising people in far-off Northern India.

Again and again his essays and scripts would come back with comments to the effect of: ‘Fascinating – but not what we were asking you to discuss’, and a bare pass mark (or even an outright fail).

For this, and possibly other reasons, he never seemed to advance in his studies, perhaps because most of his instructors were conscious that he should have been teaching them rather than the other way round. His grandmother had, however, bequeathed him a certain amount of money to be paid out each year he was in tertiary study – that was the exact wording of the codicil – so there was no real incentive for him to stop what he was doing and get ahead.

As long as they had interesting new courses for him to sign up for, he was ready to keep on studying until the crack of doom.

Even the laid-back universities of all those years back had regulations about the need to complete your qualifications in a certain amount of time, however. So there did come a moment when he had to choose between advancing to graduate level and leaving the place altogether.

One could see what a struggle it was, how much he resisted even that much coercion, but he did finally consent to trade in a number of credits for entry to a graduate-level programme in ‘General Studies.’

It didn’t take. It’s much harder to hide at the back of the class when you’re one of only three or four students in your professor’s office. He couldn’t hide his immense knowledge and omnivorous appetite for random information. He also couldn’t hide his refusal to specialise in just one aspect of this avalanche of erudition.

Finally they gave him an ultimatum. Finish a focussed researched essay on a certain, pre-announced topic, or leave with whatever qualifications (if any) could be salvaged from this heap of half-completed or scraped-through courses.

I think that that may have been when I stopped visiting him, in fact. I’d graduated from the university long since, moving from Bachelor’s to Master’s studies in my chosen discipline, Library Science. On one level I could see that he envied this: this adhesion to just one approach to the labyrinth of knowledge – and, given it really concerned a kind of meta-knowledge, a way of systematising information so that it could be made as easily available as possible for an almost infinite range of diverse needs, right down his alley, really.

But at the same time he despised it. He was born to roam through the stacks of massive collections, rather than accepting the pre-sorted world of the Information Machine. On and on he ranted at his tormentors, resisting at every step the assigned topic of his dissertation: Sanskrit Influences on the European Folktale Tradition.

His original plan had been to trace the development from Max Müller and other adherents of the ‘solar religions’ fixation of the late nineteenth century, to the proto-Structuralist formulations of Vladimir Propp and the Finnish School. He could talk about it for hours, but somehow he couldn’t get started on actually writing it.

I advised him to record a few of his rants – if necessary, by taping, then transcribing them. Then, I argued, he could go back over them and try to splice some of them together. The introduction to all this would be dictated by the content of the eventual patchwork quilt – or mosaic.

But no, that wouldn’t work, that wouldn’t be logical. Unless one had a clear starting point, how could any mere collection of facts have lasting validity? And where to start?

I told him that this difficult in knowing how and where to start had itself been the subject of much writing. That he could begin by quoting portentous critical dicta on the paradox of beginnings, especially in a case like this, where the inherited storytelling instinct of the human race itself was in question.

I flatter myself I waxed quite eloquent on the subject.

But no, no, no, no – I didn’t understand – that was all jiggery-pokery – no-one could understand who didn’t know enough to bear in mind that … blah, blah, blah, more ranting, more reams of diverse information laid out in interminable streams.

I never consciously dropped him, but it had become obvious to me by then that I was the only one of our circle who still visited him at all, and the others’ attitude of stand-back-and-see began to make more and more sense to me.

Finally it culminated in one horrendous night at the pub, formerly the place where a group of us could argue the night away in increasingly alcohol-fuelled incoherence – our vehemence growing as our intellectual focus waned.

I’d arranged this night some weeks in advance – in itself an ominous sign of the oncoming compromises of adulthood for the rest of us (professional obligations to be rescheduled, even babysitters to be hired). Nor did it begin particularly auspiciously.

I was running a little late, and when I arrived I could see that something had already happened. The rest of the group were all assembled around a small table in the saloon bar, but Phil was standing at the bar by himself, and the others were already checking their watches and looking as if the first drink was going to be their last.

I went over to him.

– Hi man, it seems like it’s been ages and ages since we last met.
– It has.
– You’ve said hello to the others?
– I have.
– Umm … is something wrong? Did someone say something? It seems a bit frosty over there.
– Don’t ask me.
– Shall I help you with the drinks?
– No. I’ve got it.
– Mine’s a pint of lager, if you’re asking.
– Oh, I’m ordering for myself, not for anyone else. I don’t want to get into one of those standing-your-round messes.

Now that I came to think of it, he had always been a bit of a rebel when it came to buying drinks for other people. That was one of his less endearing traits, in fact, the disposition to produce a calculator and start to work out his precise share in the proceedings at the end of any shared meal out.

Actually, did he have any really endearing traits? It was hard to think of many – if any – on the fly like that.

Luckily by now the barmaid had come over to us, and we were each able to place – and pay for – our orders separately. His was a neat whisky, I was rather surprised to observe.

We came back to the table as a duo, and there seemed to be a certain reluctance in the others to shift around and leave us somewhere to sit. Just what had preceded my arrival? What had he said?

Susan, one of the more sensible of our friends, an up-and-coming GP, was quick to try to start things off again on a more even footing.

– We were just saying that it’s hard to get away for a night in the pub any more when you know you’re going to have to be up and about next morning.
– Huh, grunted Phil.
– Yes, I know what you mean, I gabbled quickly, to fill the silence. When I think of the hours I used to keep: up mid-morning, with an aching head, and not good for much till afternoon at least. It’s a miracle that any of us actually got through!
– Not all of us did, said Craig, a weaselly fellow who’d been somewhat at the edges of our gang, and whom I’d invited mainly to make up the numbers. Who, in our circle, was left who hadn’t already parted brassrags from Phil, or else left town – or even the country – though hopefully not with that as the principal motivation?
– What’s that supposed to mean? said Phil.
– Just what it says.
– You’re calling me a loser?
– If the cap fits …
– You mean that I haven’t reached the dizzying heights of middle-management in a Council office?
– It’s a long way closer to a real job than you’ve ever shown any signs of getting.

There was a raw edge in all this which implied something truly awful must have happened in the opening stages of this meeting. What had he said? He must have called them all out somehow to justify concerted retribution on this scale.

– Hey, hey, hey, I said. Let’s keep it civil.
– Civil! You didn’t hear what he said.
– No, I didn’t. But here’s your chance to forget it, whatever it was, and to concentrate on having a nice relaxing drink talking about old times.
– I don’t regret any of the things I said, chimed in Phil, eager to assist with setting the evening back on an even keel.
– You don’t? spluttered Craig. Well, in that case, I’m out of here. I don’t need your input on my life, you ridiculous dick. We all used to tolerate you for old times’ sake, but none of us ever really liked you, except for old pedantic over there.

Old Pedantic? That was a new one on me. It’s true I had observed a few poorly concealed sighs when I’d launched into a longer-than-usual explanation of some subject or other that intrigued me from time to time. Is it possible that all the time I was thinking of Phil as the pariah, it was actually me? Or even us as a pair? That we were that couple of mouthy, mismatched twins everyone dreads sitting down next to?

– That’s a little uncalled-for, I said.
– Fuck off, he replied. By now he’d worked his way out and around the table and was looking for his coat. Fuck the whole bunch of you, actually.

With Craig gone, I’d hoped that the temperature might go down a notch or two, but Phil obviously had other ideas. From the look on his face, he was actually beginning to enjoy himself. Come to think of it, he had always been one of those people who associate chaos and discord with truthfulness, and pleasant conversation with hypocrisy.

– Well, at least I got rid of that little weasel for you all. I think I might have been sick if I’d had to look at his smacked-bum face any longer.

At this even Susan, who’d been sitting purse-lipped through the previous exchange, exclaimed:

– Grow up, Phil! I knew this was a mistake, but I didn’t want to let you two down. I can see this is going nowhere.

As she stood up, the others joined her and started to make their collective way out the door. I could see by the relieved looks on their faces that it had taken quite an effort to wait even this long before decamping.

As usual, though, Susan had spoken for them, and had – in her quiet way – correctly read the group.

– Sorry. I’m really sorry, I said to her (the others deliberately not making eye contact with either of us).

She nodded, brusquely.

– Don’t call me again until you’ve both had a chance to grow up. This kind of thing gets old pretty quickly.

And then she was gone.

– What on earth did you say to them? Why were they all so mad? I asked Phil.
– Nothing they didn’t need to hear.
– What kind of an answer is that?
– Don’t you start in. It’s none of your business, anyway.
– How can it be none of my business? I’m the one who arranged for everyone to turn up this evening – and it took some doing, I can tell you.
– Maybe you shouldn’t have been late, then.
– Maybe not. But I didn’t think it was physically possible to offend so many people so fast. They do know you, after all.
– I just asked them how their kids were getting on. It’s all that lot ever think about, anyway.

This was not good news. Craig and his wife had been trying to get pregnant for what seemed like years. Susan and her husband had one kid so far, with another on the way. Their first child had Down’s syndrome, and they were hoping against hope that the second would show a clean bill of health.

One could hardly imagine a more sensitive topic for any of them, especially if accompanied – as it probably had been – by a few inflammatory comments on the statistical probabilities of birth defects.

It was, in retrospect, amazing – not that they’d left, but that they’d hung around so long. Some tribute to the enduring power of social convention, I suppose.

– But you know how hard it’s been for them! How could you do that?
– Sorry, Nanny. Did it ruin your plans for the big reunion? Trotting out the freak so all of them could patronise me and pat me on the head and tell me it doesn’t matter that I’m such a flop?
– It wasn’t going to be like that!
– You know it was. I don’t need it. I don’t need anyone’s validation, especially yours.
– Well, that’s good, because you’re not likely to get it anytime soon.
– Oh, why don’t you just piss off? I know you want to, nobody wants to get drunk with the loonytune down from the attic for his one night off per annum.
– Is that what you want?

I knew that it wasn’t, but the fact is that he was right. I did want to get out of there. I couldn’t face another evening of barbed assaults and windy speeches.

He grunted assent, and so I left.

That had been some five years before, and a good deal of fence mending had had to go on before I was readmitted to even the outer regions of the others’ sodality.

Not that I cared particularly. The revelation that Phil and I were seen as a pair had been enough to sour me on the whole bunch of them. And thus it is that adolescent friendships are eroded and shipwrecked on the hard reefs of adulthood – or words to that effect, anyway.




– So what you’re saying is, you went to a bookshop and found a book, but when you got it home, it wasn’t quite what you thought. And now you can’t find the shop again.
– Well, that’s about the size of it, yes.

It had been a bit of a shock to meet the new Phil. Married! With children, yet. Admittedly, his wife was a charmingly diminutive lady from South-East Asia. And the two children, a boy and a girl, were hers from a previous marriage.

Nevertheless, the immaculate nature of his home, the careful hospitality of the greeting, were all quite unexpected manifestations of the great Master of Misrule.

He seemed to regard the changes with amused equanimity. And yet some aspect of his self must have craved them. He was not a person you’d associate with being railroaded into something he didn’t want to do. And yet there he was.

The study upstairs which I’d been ushered into after some minimal civilities had been exchanged at the front door was more of a piece with the former Phil. There were books spilling out from the walls onto every flat surface, naturally.

But I noticed some tell-tale signs of regular cleaning and maintenance – filing cabinets had been arranged to accommodate the overflowing mountains of paper he’d always been prone to collecting, and I felt that some kind of guiding intelligence had at last entered his life.

Conversationally, he was still much the same. But then, after all, that was what I needed: a sceptical eye to look in on some of these events and assess what they amounted to.

– So you just think I’m making it up. Or going crazy.
– I didn’t say that. The kitten had come to the door that same afternoon, is that right?
– Yes, but there’s no way those two things can be related: the kitten and the bookshop. We were at different ends of the town, and there’s nothing to suggest …
– But you came home with the book, which had somehow changed on the way back, only to find your wife …
– My partner. Margaret. We’re not married.
– Only to find your partner with a brand-new kitten. Looking after the kitten drove everything out of your mind for the next few days?
– Yes.
– So the kitten can be seen as a decoy.
– It was a real kitten. Very real.
– I’m sure it was a darling. Kittens tend to be. That’s their evolutionary advantage over other small parasitic animals.
– If you insist.
– And the book was a posthumous, unfinished work … only this one looked finished?
– Yes, that’s right.
– And the kitten died shortly afterwards?
– Yes.
– And how did your wife, or rather partner, react to that?
– Well, she was devastated, obviously. We both were.
– Rendering you both incapable of further investigations of time-shifts or other dimensional anomalies?
– You make it sound like something out of Harry Price! Yes, I suppose so, if you want to put it that way.
– What about this dream of yours?
– Oh, I only told you that because it was the only odd dream I’ve had lately which I’ve actually been able to remember next morning. I’m sure I’ve been having plenty of others, just as weird, but they tend to dissipate the moment I wake up.
– But the dream you did remember wasn’t so very weird now, was it? You were back in the bookshop, you found two puppets, then you woke up …

He stood up and went over to one of the cupboards to one side of his study. As he opened the doors, I got a momentary sensation of something wrong, some danger, somewhere. It passed in a flash.

The cupboard was full of a mass of bric-à-brac of various kinds: toys, clocks, statues, mostly garish in their colouring, and yet, somehow, not childish in their overall effect.

Among them were a number of puppets, with their strings hooked round wooden clothes-hangers. He unhooked two of them and brought them over to show me.

They were brightly coloured Indian puppets. One was male, the other female. Reversed, each contained an alternate of the opposite sex.

– Is this what they looked like?
– Yes. Yes, but not exactly. The ones in the dream were slightly larger and more detailed. But basically, yes.
– So you dreamed about these puppets before you came to see me. Had you ever seen anything like them before?
– Well, I guess that I must have done. I couldn’t have seen them in my dream unless I’d already known about that way of constructing dolls, I guess.
– Let’s leave the guessing out of it for the moment. You’ll agree, at least, that it’s a remarkable coincidence that I should have two puppets of precisely the same type, and should be able to show them to you just after you’ve finished telling me about them?
– Yes, I’ll give you that. But what does it all mean?
– Mean? Well, nothing, of course. That is, in the sense that you’re using the word. But if you’re asking is there something going on, something out of the usual range of probabilities, I’d have to say yes.
– How did you get them? The puppets, I mean?
– You certainly use that word mean in a lot of different ways! I got them from my wife, actually. They were a wedding present. Apparently, where she comes from, it’s customary to have a pair of puppets of this type. Rather like love-birds.
– Rather Freudian, isn’t it?
– Well, yes, that’s what I thought, too. But Amina is quite a remarkable person. She doesn’t do anything without a good reason. So I’ve got used to going along with her ideas on matters like that.

It was hard to believe my ears. The ultimate reductionist chauvinist turned feminist! It did go some way towards explaining just why he’d listened so patiently to my patently paper-thin story of semi-paranormal events, though.

– So where does that leave us?
– It leaves you right where you came in, I suppose. I have no light to throw on any of the phenomena you’ve described to me, but I accept that, in aggregate, they appear to have some as-yet-undisclosed meaning for you.
– Oh, great. Thanks for nothing. So I’m just going off my trolley, is that it?
– Maybe. But maybe not. Your ability to consider and examine the things that you’ve told me all weighs in your favour. You don’t sound like a fanatical occultist, determined to find meanings in everything that happens. And then there is the matter of the two puppets.
– But is that any more than a striking coincidence?
– Who knows? I’d be inclined to call it more of a synchronicity … in the Jungian sense.
– Which is?
– A manifestation of some principle of significant grouping in events as they befall us. In their book about it, Jung and his collaborator, Wolfgang Pauli, call it ‘an acausal connecting principle’ behind the universe as we see it.
– So what do I do now?
– I’m not sure that you actually have to do anything. If anything further occurs, it won’t be at your prompting, I shouldn’t think. Just wait and see. And keep a record of what’s going on. Oh, and keep me informed.
– Are you sure? You’re not just saying that to get rid of me?
– No, no. You’ve got me interested now. Just one thing, though. If anything further does happen, and you want to discuss it, I think we should include Amina in the conversation. She’s not scientific, but she is insightful about matters of this sort.

Another bombshell. A mere woman to join our conversation! Who was this man? More to the point, was I the one who’d been underestimating him all this time. After all, where was Margaret in all this? Why hadn’t I shared any of my thinking with her?

I guess I’d thought, at first at least, that the loss of the kitten would make it too painful. But maybe it simply was that I didn’t associate our relationship with abstract discussions of this kind.

Not so with Phil and Amina. Food there for thought – thoughts on many different (and mostly uncomfortable) subjects.


4

This time it got genuinely weird.

I was caught in one of those recurring anxiety dreams which come to plague us all at times. This time I was in a vast camping ground with a group of friends: I’m almost sure that one of them was the actor Edward Woodward, but I have no idea why. I’ve never met him, and wouldn’t say I’d particularly followed his career. I did, however, once watch a film where he was caught on a small island full of strange people from whom he was trying to escape – until he discovered he was actually one of them …

At some stage I’d discovered that I didn’t have any pants on – they were lost with the rest of my luggage – so I kept on wandering around in my shorts, trying in vain to find a way out of this labyrinth of cramped corridors, muddy fields, and inquisitive crowds of tourists.

When I finally woke up, I thought I hadn’t. It was still pitch black, and I seemed to be lying on some raised banquette covered in felt.

I certainly wasn’t in my bed at home, but when I reached out my arm to find a lamp or some other source of illumination, there was a spine-chilling crash of falling objects.

I couldn’t see what they were, but they sounded like books. It’s not entirely unknown for me to go to sleep with a few books on the bedside table (and sometimes one or two on the covers as well – Margaret and I decided long since that in the interests of getting a good night’s sleep, it was best to occupy separate bedrooms).

It wasn’t especially easy to get up. I seemed to be bumping into walls and tables in unexpected places, and there was a definite feeling of size about the place I was in. It seemed larger than my bedroom – than any of the rooms in our apartment, in fact.

Had I been sleepwalking? Had I somehow ended up in somebody else’s space? An open garage, perhaps? Or the stockroom at the back of a shop? Surely I’d have been conscious of doing something like that?

I didn’t have any matches, and the luminous dial on my watch did nothing to light up the ambient space. I used to sleep with a torch by my bed as a boy – until they discovered me using it to read after light’s out. I hadn’t regretted the loss of it for years, but now it would have come it very handy indeed. And one can never find a light-switch in a strange house.

By now I was at risk of losing contact with even the shelf, or couch, or whatever it was I’d been lying on. It was only by dint of much groping about that I was able to locate it again.

I patted it down quickly to make sure that there was nothing left there to find: no keys, no wallet, no other useful trinkets. And then set out on my journey of discovery.

I was in two minds about it, really. On the one hand, there was something to be said for staying put – for waiting for dawn to come and the light to come in and guide me on my way out.

On the other hand, what if there was no dawn? What if this space was completely blanked out to outside light? In that case I’d be sitting there forever, waiting for a release which would never arrive.

Strangely enough, I hadn’t even tried shouting for help before this. The embarrassment factor of being found in someone else’s lockup was so strong that I’d hoped against hope to be able to find my way out without alerting anyone to my presence.

Now, however, I threw caution to the winds, and started to cry out. Tentatively at first, and then more loudly.

Nothing. Nothing at all. I could have sworn that I felt the slight swirl of a breeze on my cheek after my initial shout, but it must have been my imagination. Certainly there was no answer; no creaking boards, even, to betoken a silent presence watching me.

Now there was a creepy thought. What if this place was being overlooked by someone with special glasses? They’d be able to see me easily, watch me groping around, my arms outstretched to locate unseen obstacles, whining and screeching with fear of the dark.

But then all the lights came on.




I don’t know why, mind you. Perhaps they were on a timer. Certainly there was no patter of feet coming to investigate the intruder as the light spread out all around me.

I was quite blinded at first. I had to close my eyes and gradually try to accustom them to such a shift in the spectrum.

As things began to come into focus, though, I could see that I was in a long aisle of books – in the midst, presumably, of many other such aisles stretching out all around me.

Was it the bookshop again? There seemed little reason to dispute it. It did make me wonder just how much I was actually ‘there’, however. It felt too real for me to be dreaming, though. I pinched myself. Ow!

There seemed no real point in doubting that – to all intents and purposes – I was stranded in that same strange space, with no idea how I got there, dressed only in a vest and pyjama bottoms.

But while I was definitely there in the flesh – and awake, too – how could it be that I’d found my way back to that invisible shop? There was something so odd about it, that I couldn’t help wondering if I’d been drugged, or was simply hallucinating.

The bookshelves looked horribly familiar, though – I hadn’t had time to explore the whole place, but I knew the general look of its displays well enough. Wherever ‘there’ had been, then, I was definitely back in it again.

All of which should have made it easy enough for me to find the exit. After all, I’d had less trouble getting out than getting in last time. There’d been a sense of illimitable expanses around me even then, though, and this time I seemed to be stuck right in the middle of it all.

But it’s a long road that has no turning, and this one too had its centre – if not (as yet) any obvious way out.

There’s a scene in an old Three Stooges movie, where the hapless trio come round the corner in a library only to find a ghostly custodian hovering in front of one of the shelves.

When they try to speak to her, she shushes them. She is, one presumes, the ghost of a librarian who has never found her way out of the stacks.

Coming round this corner, I saw … not a floating female ghost, nor even a tiny kitten, but a slightly shimmery patch of air.

It looked like a kind of membrane, stretched over the passage between two sets of shelves. A membrane, but also a flame – there was a distinct intensity to the light refracted through it, seen from certain angles, which almost resembled fire.

Whatever it was, it stopped me short. There seemed to be no way forward without pushing through it, and that I felt distinctly reluctant to do.

Turn back, then? Looking behind me, I saw nothing but ridge after ridge of shelves, with no apparent end, stretching out to the unimaginable back shelf.

Should I stay or should I go?

Coming nearer to the area of disturbance, the patch in the air, I had the distinct impression that I could at least partially see through it. But where you would have expected to see a refracted version of the shelves that surrounded me, instead I thought I saw something else.

Not a room inside, though for a moment it looked a bit like a blank chamber, a bit like those imaginary buildings created on bombing ranges: half bunker, half suburban dreamhouse. It somehow resolved itself and came into focus as a desert landscape: ridged with slight dunes, and some stubby vegetation accentuating its contours.

Was that anywhere I wanted to visit? Not really, no, but there wasn’t much profit in staying where I was now, either. Nor, even if I did escape, again, from this bewildering bookshop, was there any assurance I wouldn’t find myself back here again, the next time I nodded off, or turned a corner in the street.

I put out one hand, tentatively – there seemed to be no resistance. Nor, when I pulled it back, did it seem scorched or otherwise altered by the experience.

At a certain point you have to act or admit defeat: submit yourself to be acted upon. There was no clue what to do in such circumstances, what action to choose, so I chose to go forward. I pushed through the patch of slightly resistant air.




– The dreams I’ve been having lately, I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy!

This was the first time I’d sat down with Amina as well as Phil to discuss what was happening to me. He seemed convinced that she might be able to help, and given his own disposition simply to question each statement I made, I couldn’t help but think she could hardly do worse.

I’d just told them about my bookshop experience, the third time I’d found myself in there, if you counted the time when I’d found the puppets. It hadn’t been quite a bookshop then, but seemed in some sense to inhabit the same space.

Amina looked doubtful, then darted a glance at Phil, as if asking permission to speak.

– Go on, he said. Tell him what you told me.

I won’t quote her verbatim. Her English was good, though slightly accented, but there was a good deal of groping for words and expressions which I can’t really reproduce. Nor would it be worthwhile to do so.

The substance of what she said, though, was that I was in grave danger.

– The place you are in, is no place. It is in your mind. But that does not mean it is under your control.
– How do you mean?
– I mean that it keeps on making itself known to you: saying hello in the language it has taken from you. You like books and bookshops, so it acts as a bookshop.
– But I don’t like deserts, particularly. So why did it turn into a desert? Or why did it look like a desert on the other side of the membrane?
– The membrane, you call it? I would call it the door. You have stepped through the door, and now it has you. You have entered on its path.
– What path do you mean? How do I get off it, get back to reality, normality?
– There is no way back. You have chosen.
– But I didn’t really have a choice. There was no way back.
– You understand that that is just how it seemed. If you had been a different person, it would have been different.
– So what do I do now?
– You must go on.
– But how. How do I go on? I’m back here, now. Where is it it’s trying to get me to go, anyway?
– You are familiar with the, how do you say it? … the underworld?
– I know that there’s supposed to be such a thing in some religions and belief systems. I wouldn’t say that I’m familiar with it, exactly.
– But you know what it is?
– I know some things about it, yes.
Phee-lip (No-one else had ever called him anything but Phil, or Dick, but for her it was something like Phee-lip) Phee-lip knows more about these things than I do, but he has not been there. All theory for him.
– And you have? Been there, I mean?
– Yes, I believe so. A long time ago. More than one time. But not like you. I had a guide, help from others.
– Perhaps you should tell him? prompted Phil.
– Okay. I don’t speak of this often. Especially not here. People do not understand. At home, though, the older people know more about these things.
Long time ago, when I was a little girl, I fell into a well. It was very deep, and very dark, and it was too narrow for anyone else to come down and find me. I cried for my mother, but she couldn’t reach me. They lower me water, food. I stay alive, but I can’t get out.
But then the wise one. How do you call it? Phil says Shaman, Medicine Man. We just say wise one. He is a she. They come down and find me, in the dark, in my dreams, while I am still there, in the well. They offer me choices, speak to me. I can go on or I can stay. I ask what there is to go on to. They tell me no way of knowing unless you choose that. They say there is pain here, if I stay. There, no pain.
I ask about my mother, my brothers. What will happen to them if I go? The wise one don’t know. Only show me the bones of all the others around me, ones who have gone on. I can join them and then the bones will all stand up!
This scares me. I am only a little girl, only seven years old. I say I want to stay.
– Are you sure? they ask. Yes, I am sure.
And then I wake up. I am back in my room in the house. No fall in well, no lowering of water. No-one knows what I am talking about! But after I tell them my dream, they take me to see the wise one. And the wise one, they know. They say they will speak to me alone. They ask ‘Well, are you happy?’
– Yes, I say, but feel confused, don’t understand.
– We will speak of this once, and only once, they say. You make that choice to go back, not go on. Now it is set. You will live out your life, but all will be changed. You will go to strange places, and live a strange life. No-one can tell where or when it will end. You will see things others don’t see, know things others don’t know. You will speak strange languages, and sometimes you will be able to help people on their way.
– And will I be like you? I ask. Will I be a wise one?
– Yes and no, they say. I will not be trained, like them, not live apart and talk to strange people no longer alive. But I will still know things and hear things that others don’t. But I must resist the desire to know more: to push on into the shadows. That is not for me. That is not what I come back for.
– So is that what you think has happened to me? Was I offered the same choice that you were?
– Not quite the same, no. For me, I could go on, be dead, as you say it. Or I could go back, be alive instead.
– So you’re saying, in the dream I chose death rather than life: chose to push on into the next world?
– No, no, no. For you the choice is different. You are already dead. You have been dead quite some time. For you the choice is which level to be on: what to see, what you can allow yourself to understand.




As she said it, I knew it to be so.

Dead! It explained so much: the catching up with – strangely transformed – old friends, the dream of the ideal bookshop, the shifting sightlines from moment to moment.

I began to see what an effort had gone into maintaining this illusion. How much I’d laboured at creating a simulacrum of everyday life. Not consciously, mind you, but simply because that’s what the mind does.

Not so much the brain as the mind, you understand – my brain was no doubt oxygen-starved long since – though, come to think of it, just as in dreams, the sense of duration might be wildly misleading; I might have stopped breathing just a moment before.

Presumably my continued sense of a self must be centred somewhere to be reacting to these mind-created events and scenes all around it. I hardly dared use words such as ‘soul’ or ‘spirit’ – pneuma to the Greeks – but then if not that exactly, what?

So long as there was a self to deride and punish, there was, presumably, life – ‘It’s life, Jim, but not as we know it.’

All I could see now were Amina’s dark eyes, kohl-darkened, as if framed by a hijab or a veil. They looked at me kindly, I thought, as if conscious of my turmoil, and yet unable to help in any substantive way.

My last thought, as I closed my own – non-existent? – eyes was of the kitten. So much pain and emotion, squandered on a mere dream creature. But what else were we here for? What other objects could I salvage from this darkness?

Here we go again, my lips whispered.




[Editor’s note: This is where the fragment ends. There are a couple of notes some pages further on in the ledger which seem to be referring back to the same story, though:
If Phil is van Helsing, Amina Lucy, Margaret Mina, and the narrator Jonathan, who is the Count?

Strange meeting with the shadow?
It’s hard to see how this apparent reference to Bram Stoker’s Dracula is to be squared with the rest of the narrative, but I include it here for what it’s worth. – M. S.]




Notes:

[1] W. H. Auden, 'As I Walked Out One Evening'. Collected Shorter Poems: 1927-1957 (London: Faber, 1966), 86.




Jack Ross: Haunts (2024)


[30/1-8/2/22-19/9/23]

[12,053 words]

[Published in Haunts (2024)]



Suicide Note


Josef Čapek: Levana and our Ladies of Sorrow (1927)


rain also is of the process
- Ezra Pound [1]


Halfway through the conversation, I knew that I’d made a mistake.

I’d allowed him to get the better of me, just as he always does.

He was yammering on about his woes at work, as usual, and I guess it might just have been wanting to hear the sound of my own voice for a moment that made me blurt it out:

– I’ve retired.

Retired! It stopped him in his tracks, for once in a blue moon. He swallowed, looked puzzled.

Does not compute – my stupid cousin, so much younger than me, retired? I could see him working it out. Did he get fired? Is this just shorthand for ‘letting you go’, ‘freeing you up to seek other employment opportunities’? But then, how the heck could he retire? And where does that leave me?

– Well, congratulations ... I guess, he managed to crank out, finally, after much hemming and hah-ing, though you could see it almost killed him.
– Yeah, I decided that thirty years was long enough to spend in one place, doing one thing, so the next time they put round one of those ‘golden handshake’, ‘voluntary redundancy’ emails, I decided I’d take them up on it.
– But what are you going to do? How are you going to live?
– Oh, I reckon I’ll manage somehow. I mean, the mortgage is all paid off, and I do have some savings, too.
– But won’t you miss it? Being part of things, doing your job?
– Being a useful member of society, you mean? You don’t think there’s anything else I could do with my time?
– Well, what, for instance?
– None of your beeswax.
– I’m only asking for your own good. I mean, you’re nowhere near the statutory age. You’re younger than me, for God’s sake!
– Is that it? Is it the fact that I’m younger than you that sticks in your craw? Is it possible you might be just a tiny bit jealous?
– Jealous! Of you! I mean, it’s not like what you’re doing is so very important, not like ...
– Not like you, you mean?
– There’s really not much point in talking to you if you keep on interrupting. Not like saving lives or changing the world, I was going to say.
– Whereas you are ...?
– Certainly what I do is a lot more important than what you do, let’s face it. You may have the luxury of retirement, but some of us have to stay in place to keep standards up.
– You mean to block anyone younger from climbing the ladder?
Yes. If they’re not up to the job. And most of these young ones quite frankly aren’t. If it weren’t for me being there, making sure that they don’t certify anything shoddy and risk people’s lives, then ...
– So you’re not at all happy for me?
– I didn’t say that. Quite the opposite, in fact. I can see how doing a job like yours could make you wonder what it was all for.

I had to admit he had a point. Librarianship may look pretty interesting when you’re young and keen and up for a challenge, but years and years of glorified data-entry and crowd control can get you down after a while. I wasn’t going to admit that to him, though. And so I did it, played right into his hands.

– If you must know, I’m going to write.
– You’re going to write? About what?
– About anything I want to.
– About your life, you mean? Are you writing a memoir? Thirty Years in the Stacks? Or some kind of novel? Confessions of a Randy Librarian? Put me down for a copy of that one.
– I might have known you wouldn’t get it.
– Get what? Your need for artistic self-expression?
– Well, yes, in a word.
– Don’t get me wrong, I like a good read as much as the next man – and I guess that someone has to write them. Political thrillers, celebrity memoirs ... people like Lee Child, Stephen King. But who’d want to read about you?
– I guess that’s what I’ll be finding out.
– But have you ever written anything before? Have you ever published anything? Outside the school magazine, that is?

He had me again. That’s the really horrible thing about talking to him. He knows me well enough to know all the chinks in my armour. I can’t get away with anything, because he’s been there all along – sneering and acting superior since we were both kids. If only my parents had just had the sense to move away from the rest of their families.

Above all, he could see how paper-thin were my claims to a hidden cache of published stories and newspaper articles. He knew what a cliché it was to dream – after all these years of reading and classifying other people’s published books – that I, too, might be able to join their select company.

By now he was in full spate:

– I’m only saying this for your own good. I know that you’ve been through a bit lately, enough to throw anyone off their game. But you really should think twice about this one – if it’s not too late already. Even if it is too late to get your old job back, I’m sure you could get another one. There are plenty of libraries, after all – more of them than there are rugby clubs, I reckon, and you know how I feel about that. You might not be able to get in at the same level you were at, but they’d probably be glad to have you. And if you can’t manage that, I could probably put in a good word for you. I do have some pals in business who can always use help with their software and information systems. That is what you do, isn’t it? Short of that, there are probably tech hotlines ...
– Get out.
– What?
– Get out of my house.
– You’re throwing me out?
– Yes.
– Just because you can’t stand to hear the truth from someone? After all, who’s going to tell you except me?

At this stage I got up and started to clear away glasses. He glared at me, cleared his throat once or twice – thought better of it, I suppose, or just couldn’t think of anything much to add – and dragged his great bulk out of the chair and out the door of the room.

I could tell that he was planning one of his old ‘turn-in-the-doorway-to-share-some-home-truths’ routines, but I’d been had that way before. I stayed out in the kitchen, crashing pots and pans, until I felt reasonably sure that he’d left.

I couldn’t help feeling that he’d won that round on points, though, despite the abrupt departure. He’d managed to get me to lose my cool, which would enable him to relay the conversation to other members of the family coven in terms of my ranting and raving like a madman as he tried to outline coolly and calmly the error of my ways.

Most significantly of all, however, he’d tricked both the ‘retirement’ and the ‘retiring to write’ admissions out of me, and would by now no doubt be repeating them to others replete with braying laughs and dismissive comments.

If he’d been a real person, I’d have been completely in the soup.




Not that it’s all untrue, by any means. I am a retired librarian (as of a couple of weeks ago). I do have obnoxious relatives whom I’m always trying to dodge. Yes, whom. I know it sounds a bit odd, but I did study English at university, and it just feels weird to me to leave a word in the nominative case when it should be in the accusative.

I hope I’m not one of those grammar nazis. It does rather come with the territory, I would admit, but then that’s really the problem. I didn’t actually have the conversation above, but I could have. It’s what’s been going through my head ever since I decided to bite the bullet and take the offer of a golden handshake before it became too late.

I have always wanted to write. And when I was a teenager, I did. Most of what I wrote then I never showed to anyone, and most of it’s been lost over the years – or even burnt in periodic spasms of self-loathing. But there are still a few ill-spelt, scrawled sheets here and there at the bottoms of boxes of other papers.

What was I trying to express back then? Angsty teenage musings, I suppose: the usual, in other words. I was always in love with some wondrous girl who wouldn’t have given me the time of day if I’d actually had the courage to approach her.

There’s an ominous absence of any who, when, where, how – let alone why – about the bits that I’ve dared to reread, though. Nothing about the issues of the day – no vivid word portraits of my sun-baked suburban childhood, or even of the rainwashed city streets that succeeded it.

Lots and lots and lots of stuff about books, though – imitations of my favourite crime and fantasy authors, musings on poems and song lyrics (and, yes, more attempted imitations of such).

‘Abnormally unpromising’ – that’s what Kingsley Amis said of his own juvenilia. If his was unpromising, mine was just downright bad. But you can’t shut up that inner monologue – that yammering voice at the back of your head that keeps on narrating your life back to you, and supplies you with interesting and insightful thoughts about the world as a whole and human behaviour within it which would probably turn out to be the merest commonplaces if you did ever try to bring them out into the light of day.

And, yes, I know I’ve already used that word ‘yammering’, in the description of my ‘cousin’s’ conversational style above. It’s a good word, and I’ve always liked it, but I suppose I might have to do something about that if I ever get round to correcting and tidying up all this tripe.

What can I say, though? It’s just not that easy to sit down in cold blood and turn on the inner voice. It’s been repressed for so long that it’s hardly audible to me. When I’m at the desk, that is. The moment I’m away from there it starts up again with the same litany of observations and insights. But where do you start?

After a few mornings sharpening pencils and staring at sheets of blank paper – just like they do in the movies when they haven’t yet had their big idea – I realised I was punching above my weight. How can I start off writing without knowing just what it is I’m trying to write?

How do you write a novel, or a short story? And as for your childhood memoir, do you begin in the womb? I was born in a small town in ... in the year of ...? Who the hell cares? That’s the problem. Unless you’re already a celebrity with a bad cocaine habit, you need to have some other reason to report to the world on your doings and sayings.

Are you a representative child of your place and time? Yes, that might do – but representative of what? Round and round and round your mind goes, gnawing and biting at you (my mind keeps on supplying me with apposite quotations right now: ‘In a real dark night of the soul it is always three o'clock in the morning’ (F. Scott Fitzgerald), or ‘The mind has mountains; cliffs of fall ... Hold them cheap / May who ne'er hung there’ (Gerard Manley Hopkins) ... Until you just give up and go and make yourself a cup of coffee instead.

But then I thought, why not do a course?

After all, you don’t have to look far to see advertisements for that kind of thing. Every time you open a magazine, they come flashing out at you: Write your long-cherished novel – Learn the tricks of bestselling writers – reasonable terms – taught by well-published professionals (But if they’re doing so well as writers, why are they spending their time correcting other people’s stuff instead of producing more of their own?)

Whatever the possible objections, it’s clearly a well-known thing. A lot of the writers you see being interviewed go on about studying writing at university – and some of them even mention Community College courses and night-classes. There’s no shame in it, in other words. And if you find you don’t know how to do a thing, why not do a course in it to find out?

Journaling. That’s one thing they seem to encourage. Keep a journal of your life and thoughts, just putting things down in the order they come to you – not sorting through it or censoring what you say too much.

Which is why I can say now that the cat just walked in with a pretty determined look on his face, obviously perturbed at the lack of the usual attention this morning. So instead of continuing with this, I’d better get up and feed him.

Just a hint, though: I did decide to do a course, after all. Hence the ‘dialogue exercise’ I started these notes with yesterday.




At first my main criterion was something based nearby. I had in mind a sort of neighbourhood community centre, with a circle of earnest learners grouped around some tweedy old guru who commented wisely and helpfully on each person’s draft.

But then, what do I know about it? Most of my information on the subject came from watching movies about the writing business. In Sullivan’s Travels, for instance, everyone uses a typewriter, and publishers and literary agents hang around like killer bees, waiting to seize on any drops of honey that fall from the anointed one (bit of a confusing metaphor there: sorry).

And then there’s that film His Girl Friday where the reporter manages to subvert the literary ambitions of his female sidekick simply by being such an ass than she can’t bear not to reform him somehow.

The common factor in both cases seemed to be a certain glamour surrounding the actual writing process which – inevitably – takes place entirely offstage. That is, with the sole exception of the home movie made by a group of bright young things in Evelyn Waugh’s early novel Vile Bodies. Their chosen subject, the life of John Wesley, founder of Methodism, is replete with scenes of ‘Wesley writing a sermon’ – five minutes of their main character scribbling on a piece of paper, with occasional ‘ha’s and ‘that’s it’s’!

It’s not that I didn’t research the subject. That is, after all, what I do – or rather, did. I looked up every afterschool programme, every university course, wrote away for curricula, compared fee structures. It was a very satisfactory way of wasting time, really, given the needle-in-a-haystack quality of any choice made amongst so many options.

I rejected the university courses, first of all. They looked sound enough, but were – for the most part – embodied in degree structures which forced you to start off virtually with remedial English classes before you could get to any honing of your craft (though of course I acknowledge that that latter might depend on having any actual craft to hone).

No, some more soup-to-nuts course was more the thing for me – one preferably not too much dominated by my sort of people: retirees, bored suburbanites, and other typical takers-of-an-improving-nightclass-for-a-few-weeks. That was certainly the target audience for most of the offers I came across in that section of the market.

Nor was cost to be discounted as a factor. The more glittering the promises on the brochure, the more hefty the fees appeared to be. The promises of introductions to agents, automatic preferential treatment by sympathetic publishers, and general VIP entry for successful alumni struck me as just so much soft soap. I’ve read enough writers’ memoirs to know that it’s better to lavish time on the product than on the admittedly tortuous process of getting it in front of other people’s eyes.

Finally, after I’d added ‘free’ to the set of mental provisos I’d been using to sort through all this junk, a set of course notes I didn’t remember even having written away for simply arrived in the mail one day.

Paths in the Forest. That was all it said on the front. And when I leafed through it, it certainly lacked the glitz and glamour of some of the other programmes. I suppose that I had originally envisaged choosing a course I could attend physically, making friends among the other students, going for coffee after lectures. All the stuff I remember from my own university days. That eager camaraderie.

This course was entirely via correspondence. There was no physical address listed – simply a PO Box number – so I couldn’t even feel positive that it was based in the same island as me. Did that matter? Well, not so much if there were no actual fees involved. You don’t have to batter down the door of an office if no pledges have been made on either side.

Nor did it promise enlightenment. I’d already been burned by one or two offerings which seemed to be offering tuition but were actually intended as fronts for offball religions of various kinds. I had no wish to be recruited – or even indoctrinated. It was one thing to have a teacher addicted to short, pithy sentences composed in the manner of Hemingway, or long wordy paragraphs modelled on Proust. It was quite another to be offered a surefire path to the jewel at the heart of the lotus.

Paths in the Forest.

So what was the forest? The forest of desires and complexities, with occasional clearings and even vantage points from which one could survey the whole. That, it appeared from their introductory material, was the meaning behind their metaphor.

The forest was Maya – the world of illusion. But it was also the world of everyday reality, with its warring motivations and tragic (and comic) outcomes. To hear them describe it, writing was simply a way of following, and occasionally, pioneering, new tracks through this insidious undergrowth.

It was an image that appealed to me strongly. I had, after all, been a keen tramper in my youth, and had beaten my way down most of the great tracks of my homeland, from the coastal walks of the north to the dense forests of the wild west coast. I had an immediate, visceral sense that the person who could write such a description might be the one best fitted to help me.

I mean, let’s face it, how was I to know? You have to make a leap sometimes, and your knowledge of what’s going to happen can never be complete. Even if I had known then where it would lead me, would I still have made another choice?

Perhaps. But it’s hard to regret the decision to leave behind those barren mornings, that shiningly white and reproachful blank sheet of paper. Say what you will about what happened, at least it was never dull.

And I suppose, in a way, it got me by a commodious vicus back round to where I wanted to be in the first place: typing out yet more sentences on pieces of paper to share my particular set of sensations with the world!




So wait a second here. If the first piece I included was a dialogue exercise, an imagined – i.e., not real – conversation with a presumably (though not so much as you’d hope) imaginary opponent; then the second piece must have been a section of journal, devised similarly according to various undisclosed parameters, but no doubt meant for some kind of course assessment. What, then, was the third piece you’ve just read?

It sounded – at the end, at any rate – as if it had been composed long after the events of the narrative it heralds. How can it, then, be part of the assessment for this much-bruited course? Was the prescribed exercise to compose just such a piece of suspenseful foreshadowing?
Little did he know, as he came to that fork on the mountain pass, that a moment’s delay there would have altered the course of his life ...
Is that ever a permissible device? I know some novelists become addicted to it, and scatter it through their pages like confetti. Am I as desperate as that? (Of course you are, crows that chorus of voices offstage).

Well, it’s a roundabout story, I’m afraid, and unfortunately not one I can answer as easily as all that. Suffice it to say that there is some crossing of the timelines here. I am here and now (for all that good that does you, in some other here-&-now of your own), but I’m also there and then.

In other words, some of what I’m writing I’m writing right now, in full knowledge of the arc of my story, with an end in view (to borrow a phrase from Dryden – he’s dead; he won’t miss it). But not all of the writing presented here is like that. Some of it was written as course exercises, as I’ve intimated above – I suppose you’ve deduced by now that I did sign up for that course – and there are other pieces here which aren’t even by me.

In other words, I’m not the only character in my narrative, as you’ll no doubt be glad to hear. Nor am I even the only writer – as befits such a choice of subject-matter, I suppose. Nor have I even started on the real reason for all this rigmarole. It is a kind of memoir, yes, but – given that parts of it have been transposed into fiction – it also has elements of the autobiographical novel. What it’s actually about is something quite different, however.

My story is, quite literally, about life and death.




List your strengths and weaknesses as a writer.
Some of you might be in a better position to do that for me than I am if you’ve persevered this far with my narrative.

That ‘weakness’ side was looking rather overwhelming when I’d finished adding all the various items that occurred to me over the next couple of days.

I’m not keen on writing long descriptions of things that don’t really interest me: ‘The room had large windows open to the south, with windowboxes full of blue gardenias, her favourite flower. The furniture, on the other hand, was largely hand-me-downs – a settee that had come from her grandmother, an ornate table and chairs donated by a distinctly pretentious aunt.’

Nor do I like mentioning people opening and closing doors, sitting in chairs, standing by the mantlepiece, and all the other things they might be expected to do as they go about their business. Cut to the chase, that’s my motto. But I’m forced to admit that doesn’t make me the ideal fit for a realist novelist.

Dialogue, too. I keep on remembering that adage attributed to the egregious Dr. Johnson: ‘Nothing can be easier than to write conversations. A question provokes a response, that response another. The problem is rather how to leave off than how to continue.’ Or words to that effect: the exact phrasing escapes me for the minute.

It’s very hard to avoid the effect of yourself talking to yourself when you construct such exchanges. While it’s true that they do fill the pages, making them pointed enough to convey information and character is not nearly so easy to do.

Descriptions, dialogue ... what else? Character! Yes. It’s easy enough to call your miserly neighbour Mister Scrimpnsave, and the drunken buffoon on the other side Tom Cheeryglug. It was good enough for Dickens, so it’s good enough for us. But as for those minutely observed types, those Mrs. Dalloways and Leopold Blooms from the great age of the novel around the turn of the century, what of them? Are such people no longer imaginable in our own era of pluralism? How can any writers now expect such close shared knowledge to be applied to the circumstances, beliefs and upbringings of the cardboard cutouts they create?

With problems such as these, what’s the point of even trying to become a writer? That was the unpleasant reality I was facing before I’d even been ‘assessed’ by the distant course-masters.

I’d decided from the beginning that honesty would serve me better than defensiveness. And yet, paradoxically, it’s far easier for a fearful soul to list deficiencies than strengths. What, then, were my strengths?

A huge amount of desultory reading, resulting in a stock of quotes and miscellaneous knowledge about this and that seemed likely to be one. But then I remembered Henry James’s conviction that a lifetime of watching – and analysing – French melodramas had equipped him to construct one of his own. He knew all the tricks of the trade, he was sure – but the boos of the rowdy audience on the first night of Guy Domville taught him otherwise.

Add it to the mix, though. After all, James went on to apply those same lessons, ‘the divine principle of the scenario,’ as he put it, to the series of increasingly taut and terrifying novellas and novels he wrote in the late 1890s.

More than just the tricks of the trade, and a quote for every occasion, I could (I thought) detect in myself a taste for the convoluted and self-questioning. The authors who spoke to me most clearly were those who went in for narratives half-glimpsed through the mirror of some other, more overt story. Writers such as François Rabelais, Laurence Sterne, James Joyce – confidence tricksters and prestidigitators, building elaborate altars so that the fire of heaven could descend elsewhere.

I wrote that down as a strength, also.

Which provoked a response. The first one which sounded like more than a pre-printed form letter, in fact.

There were, it appeared, no grades within this course – at any rate, not for the preliminary manoeuvrings necessary to assign you to a level within their labyrinth of options. But my answers to the questionnaire did appear to have passed muster.

How could they not? I wondered cynically. Perhaps the phrase ‘Diddle diddle dumpling my son John’ might have gone over just as well …

Nor had any last-minute demand for ‘administration’ fees suddenly appeared (or even been intimated) at this point, so I couldn’t but feel that all I was likely to incur was a waste of my time rather than any other resources.

The answer came by mail: a single typed line. It read:
You are hopeless.
But then, on the back of the page, there was a seemingly disconnected, so therefore perhaps automatic phrase:
You have been accepted.
There was also a printed brochure included with a series of details about how often I should post my exercises, how they should be formatted, and the kinds of responses I could expect.

I didn’t feel much better off as a result of all this self-scrutiny, but the mere fact of having an audience – if only an implied, essentially invisible auditor – somehow made the whole thing seem less futile.

Even being found ‘hopeless’ implied some kind of collective obstacle race which I had now, indubitably, entered. You can’t fail unless you actually try, and I felt for the first time that I was beginning to try.

After all, how many writers’ memoirs were full of accounts of those long steady years of grinding out novels for the desk drawer until your true voice appeared, one day, out of the blue – the magical tone of the first lines of Huckleberry Finn, for instance, sounding out clearly through the cacophony of Tom Sawyer’s childish antics.

It comes when you least expect it, that much was clear to me. And if you ignore it, there’s every chance that it will never come again. You have to be prepared to drop everything for the mere chance that this is the vital moment. Ye know not the day nor the hour (you are, of course, quite right to detect in me the lingering effects of early religious education), so you must be forever on guard.

I would not be found wanting. I would despatch my reports regularly to the address I’d been given. I would carry out my assignments religiously (there’s that word again) until that true voice should deign to manifest itself, be that early or late in the game.




My Best Friend

It was while I was still with Margaret, some ten years ago now. We’d driven out into the country to unwind a bit, something which always seemed to involve stopping at the maximum number of roadside fruit stalls (for her) and obscure vintage shops, particularly ones with a couple of shelves of books out the back (for me).

This stall was outside an orchard, so we were looking happily through trays of apples and stone-fruit when I saw a flash of white in one of the packing cases down behind the counter. What’s that? I asked without thinking (not like me to strike up a conversation without much previous calculation) ...

D’you want to see? Said the grinning young lady who seemed to be in charge of sales that day (I almost wrote ‘manning the stall,’ but I am trying to learn – albeit slowly – to purge my discourse of inappropriate archaisms).

I followed round to the back of the booth. There on the ground was an old wooden crate covered with a piece of brown paper. She lifted it off, and there they were: two lovely little kittens, one black and white and the other one raven black, lying asleep in each other’s arms.

I’m not sure that I’ve ever seen anything quite so beautiful, so peaceful and life-affirming, in all my born days.

– Oh my God, they’re just so cute! Margaret had joined us by now, and was standing, awe-struck, just behind me.
– Interested? Free to a good home! said the laughing teen.
– Are you sure? I said. I mean ... don’t you want to keep them?
– Nah. We might keep one of the other kittens, but these two are off to the SPCA if we can’t find someone to take them. This place is chock full of cats. We got dogs here, too. And horses.
– Well, if you put it like that. What do you think, Margaret?
– Do you even have to ask?

So, to make a long story short, the teen’s parents – a muddy but smiling pair – were duly summoned from whatever part of the property they’d been labouring in. It’s true that I had already been judging them somewhat, given that ominous mention of the SPCA, but they did seem to be genuine animal lovers, given the numerous questions they asked us to establish our
bona fides.

And so we set out that day as a couple, footloose and fancy-free. We returned anxious fur-parents, me driving as slowly as I could to avoid exciting them too much. Faint chance of that! They were crawling round the floorboards the moment the engine started, with Margaret stuck in the backseat, trying to cuddle them into submission.

Many were the adventures along the way. Their first – painful – visit to the vet. They had to be seen separately, as that way they were just a bit turbulent: together they were uncontrollable.

There was the time that Toby (named after Tristram Shandy’s uncle – if you must know – because of the latter’s habit of constructing earthworks in the backyard) managed to get himself stung on the lip by a bee. Oh, a sorry young kitten was he that day! I can still see the look of shock and indignation on his face as it swelled and swelled. The vet said there was nothing to worry about, though, and sure enough he was right as rain next day – a little more cautious out in the garden perhaps? It’s hard to say. He certainly seemed as bumptious as ever.

They went wandering, got caught in other people’s basements, having slipped in like shadows when no-one was looking. They got drenched in thunder storms, crying and moaning under bushes (and, on one occasion, under the front wheels of the neighbour’s car).

Jane Eyre, the other kitten (named by Margaret after her favourite novel), was quite a wanderer. I guess – with unconscious sexism – I’d expected her to be the stay-at-home one, with Toby as the extravert. Not so, though. While he was very earnestly digging out in the garden, his little white bum waving around in the air, she would be slinking around the neighbourhood, going into shops to greet the customers, even having to be brought back home by anxious neighbours on more than one occasion.

Which was quite prophetic, really. Because as our problems and arguments increased, it became more and more apparent that Margaret and I were not going to work longterm. It didn’t seem to matter how much effort we put into it – after each awkward (but heartfelt) reconciliation, next day we’d back at it again, a nightmarish round of suspicions and accusations. We just didn’t fit together.

So when she decided to take up another job, in another city, elsewhere, a little black cat went with her.

Toby was definitely in mourning for his sister and constant companion for quite some time after that. My heart had belonged to him since that day by the orchard, but I hadn’t thought that degree of emotion could actually increase.

But when I saw him wandering around the house, checking under cushions, meowing at closed doors, I felt so powerless to help him. If he’d got plenty of cuddles before, he got far more of them now. At first he resisted a bit (holes to dig, places to go, vermin to pursue), but after a while he seemed to get reconciled to it.

He became my little shadow – jumping in the warm spot the moment I got up from bed or from a chair, breaking the silence with a constant litany of meowed conversation (that is, after all, what they tell us it is: cats don’t talk like that to each other, only to humans).

And so it has remained. I suppose you could say that I’ve used him as a kind of excuse for not getting back on the horse: frequenting the singles scene, trying out dating. But we understand each other, Toby and I. He knows how to shape his day into a satisfactory form. It’s more of a choice of places to nap than places to dig in, now, as he attains maturer years, but his cheeky little face has remained much the same.

He’s suspicious of strangers, but also fascinated by them. On the rare occasions I have a visitor, he’ll sit somewhere nearby, sizing them up, refusing to come to them, but intensely interested to see what they’ll do next.

I love him and I believe he loves me too.

I know people say that it’s just cupboard love. That if I dropped dead and the food stopped appearing, it wouldn’t be long before he was gnawing on my leg. That may well be, but I wouldn’t grudge him that.

It doesn’t change the fact that he always wants to be where I am, that he presses his little furry body up against me at night, and relies on me if loud noises – such as those thrice-cursed firework displays! – are going on somewhere near.

I don’t know if he sees me as a parent, a brother, or another errant kitten, but we constitute a party of two. If he were ever to be taken from me I’m not quite sure what I would do. He constitutes my greatest hostage to fortune, the thing whose loss would make nonsense of everything else that remains.





It was with a certain trepidation that I submitted my first couple of exercises. There was a rough word-length (1,000 words +/– 10%), and a suggested topic for each, but little else in the way of information about just how they should be approached.

Nor could I quite see the relevance of the writing samples supplied. There was one about two Victorian ladies wandering through the gardens of Versailles which was certainly atmospheric, but I couldn’t quite see how it amounted to a treatise on friendship, exactly.

But perhaps that was the point? Perhaps it was the underlying message of all these minutely detailed accounts of the grounds, in all their creepiness? Mr. Eliot calls it the ‘objective correlative’ – describing a thing in order to evoke a certain emotion somehow mysteriously associated with that thing, without ever mentioning the emotion itself?

In that case, the piece could be about friendship simply because that feeling is never named.

I suppose that I had a pretty clear idea of what I was expecting in the way of response. One had to wait quite a while for that to be supplied – presumably because of the difficulty of getting around to all of the exercises produced by so large a clientele.

That is, if there were any other clients. The materials I’d received so far implied that they’d been prepared for a large general audience, but that could have been simply an assumption on my part. But why else would anyone go to so much trouble for a single recipient?

I could anticipate the direction of the critique so clearly that I’d practically supplied it myself by the time the actual notification arrived. ‘Don’t intrude ideology into your piece, by going off at tangents’ – ‘Clarify the exact ways in which your love for your pet relates to your relationship with your former partner’ ...

The message I actually received appeared to relate to both of the texts I’d submitted. At any rate it didn’t differentiate clearly between them. Nor was there any clear evidence within it to establish that either had actually been read. For all I could tell, it could easily have been manufactured in advance. In the interests of full disclosure, though, I’ll copy it here:
  • The charting and disclosure of pain is the principal task of the creative artist. You have made a start upon that road.
  • Press on the points one by one till you find all those that hurt.
  • Your best friend is your worst enemy because they can mask and divert that pain. In that sense, since their continued life is your joy, their absence or death may serve you better. The degree of your love for them is to be measured solely by your suffering at their loss.
  • Your worst enemy is your best friend. Their blundering and offensive remarks and actions cut through the integuments of your soul. Cultivate their society till you reach the limits of your endurance. Going past that will open up the true road.
  • As is to be expected at this stage, you have failed to grasp the fuller dimensions of either task, and have not penetrated the clues which have already been given. Your stupidity and obstinacy are to be praised, though, as they mean that you may still be capable of being hurt into learning.

‘Being hurt into learning’ – ‘the integuments of your soul’? It sounded like a load of occultist gibberish to me, and yet it did seem to relate – vaguely – to some of what I had written about my cousin and my cat: not to mention about ‘Margaret’ …

I promise to stop now with the inverted commas around assumed names – I just thought I’d throw a few in to remind you that most names and details have been changed to shield the innocent – and the guilty, for that matter – not that I’m sure that this is my story, exactly, but whoever’s it is, I seem to be the one telling it, and so I do have to preserve some decorum in how it’s approached.

But the strange thing is that it all made a certain sense to me. I had been writing to exorcise certain irritations and painful memories. And there was a sense of relief in airing them even in this very controlled (and hopefully completely private) context. The fact that they were out there on paper somehow made it possible to manipulate the details as if they were separate from myself. It made those occasions objective, outward phenomena – rather than burning, still-open wounds.

Again, I couldn’t persuade myself that there was no more to be learned by pursuing this particular path. There did seem to be certain insights forthcoming – admittedly more from my experience of the writing than from any of the comments I’d so far received on it.

But the mere fact of writing for somebody else’s eyes seemed to free me up to be more self-critical, to judge the possible effect of certain word-choices, locutions, on that other, inevitably idealised reader. Someone who was, in some sense, myself, and yet – in another way – emphatically wasn’t.

Oh God, I can hear myself saying it: ‘if only I had known ...’




I was quite proud of the next few stories I submitted, I must admit.

Course politics! If you think you’ve divined the direction of your teacher’s interests, it makes sense to provide material which seems to match them. Séances and hauntings were all we’d really encountered in most of the readings so far – talk about The Haunted Study!

I’d always heard that the bourgeois novel depends on wills and adultery for its very existence. But this course seemed dedicated to the proposition that the living were simply figures caught in a waiting room in transit to the tomb.

Edgar Allan Poe, E. T. A. Hoffmann, Nikolai Gogol – these (apparently) were the great figures it behoved us to study. I’d hardly even heard of Hoffmann, though I had read some stories by the other two.

Which raises the question whether tempering your style and subject matter to fit someone else’s tastes really constitutes learning, or just an advanced case of sycophancy? By now, though, my major focus had shifted elsewhere.

I remember once seeing a girl in the library slip a small piece of paper into the pages of the book in front of her. Alert to the possibility of nefarious activity of some kind, I strolled over to her table all casual-like.

The book was handwritten – I managed to see that much before she turned round in her seat to face me.

– You’re wondering what I’m doing, I suppose.

I was wearing my little librarian’s badge, or else my attempts at snooping might have looked more suspicious.

– Is that a journal you’re writing in?
– Right in one. It is, yes.
– I’m sorry. I have to ask. What was that you just slipped into your book?
– Oh, it’s not a piece of priceless manuscript, if that’s what you’re thinking. Here, take a look for yourself.

She held up the book to me, wide open, her thumb held hard on the crack in the spine. As I took it from her, I saw an old playing card.

– A card?
– Yes. I found it by the entrance outside. I always pick them up and put them straight into my diary.
– Always? Has it happened more than once?
– It happens all the time! See for yourself ...

Since her gesture implied that I was free to leaf through her book, I proceeded to do so, trying hard not to read too much of what was written there.

What I saw were playing cards. Other cards, too – business cards, logos, but mostly the scruffy, multi-sized remnants of a series of dismembered decks.

– Is somebody leaving them for you?
– Oh no. At least, I don’t think so. They just seem to ... happen.
– Do they mean anything? The numbers. Do you check them? Are they sequential, significant?
– I used to, yes. I spent ages looking through astrology and numerology books. But now I just pick them up and keep them. I don’t actually think they have any real significance at all.
– But what would happen if you stopped picking them up?
– I think that they’d just stop happening. But maybe there’s more to it than that. Maybe something bad would happen. I don’t really think so, but it doesn’t seem worth taking the risk. So I just pick them up and keep them in here.
– Have you discussed it with anyone?
– With a doctor, you mean? Or perhaps a priest? No, you’re the first. Nobody’s ever shown an interest before, and I don’t show my diary to anyone else.

Blushing, realising that I’d held onto to it for far too long, I shut her notebook and handed it back to her.

– Sorry. Here’s your book back.
– Not at all. I asked you to look through it, after all.
– I have to say, I’ve never in my life seen a playing card lying by itself on the ground, let alone picked it up.
Now you will.

And do you know, she was right. A couple of days later, walking down a footpath in a strange part of town, I saw a playing card lying right there in front of me. And, like her, for fear of some consequence if I didn’t, I picked up the card and tucked it into my own notebook.

It never happened again, but it did seem a bit beyond casual coincidence.

It’s very tempting to make the girl in the library Margaret, and turn the whole thing into some sort of fateful mating ritual, but that might sound a bit cheesy. In fact I never saw her again. Perhaps she regretted sharing so much of her secret with someone she’d never met before. Or perhaps she was never really there at all.

The bit about the cards is true, though. Which (I suppose) was why I was pre-primed to find significance in the little things that had started to happen by then.

The first one was innocuous enough.

I had a storeroom downstairs where I kept the overflow from my book collection, as well as a lot of other odds and ends. When I went down there one morning, I found that the lightbulb had busted.

It wasn’t that it had simply stopped working. There was broken glass scattered all over the floor, as if someone had simply walked into it by mistake and cracked it off its base.

Well, that can happen, of course. I managed to unscrew the jagged remains of the bulb, and replace it with another one.

It worked well enough – at first – but a couple of days later I came down and found that the same thing had happened again.

After that scarcely a day went by that I didn’t find something disturbed or misplaced down there – a handful of change scattered over the floor, a set of books turned backwards, with their spines facing inwards. It was a fairly low-key version of what I’d always been taught were the signs of a poltergeist haunting.

I’d read enough on that subject to know that paying attention to such things tends to give them oxygen. One can be better off shutting off the area and disturbing it as little as possible.

So that’s what I did. It wasn’t exactly sealed off from the world, but I did lock the door, and hang the key in my study upstairs where nobody was likely to find it.

After that, things started to get a bit more serious.




I’ve always been a vivid dreamer. At least, so I suppose. I usually wake up with the impression of a number of overlapping dreams, of immense significance at the time, but fading into nothingness as I try to grasp at the details.

The exceptions have been those dreams which I saw even at the time as important. One vital dream of reconciliation and forgiveness at the worst moment of a break-up ... another dream which had me working at an improvised animal shelter, cuddling up to poor, abused cats, just before I made the vital decision to retire from my job (‘herding cats’ – get it?).

Now, however, the cumulative effect of the dreams I was having – and mostly remembering in detail next morning – was rapidly getting out of hand. I’ll give you one example:


I was walking down a dark street flanked by tall, overarching ruins. It looked a little like some of the pictures I’ve seen of London after the Blitz – bricks spilled out across the road, void areas of darkness alternating with the fronts of the buildings.

There was somewhere urgent I needed to be, but every turn I chose seemed to take me further away from it. I had an immense, almost overwhelming sense of anxiety at the back of my mind. I wanted to get there – wherever that was – yet my chances of doing so were clearly leaking away with each passing moment.

At length, after an indeterminate time of walking, passing what looked like the same buildings again and again – as if, every time, I was missing some crucial turn – I saw a lone figure standing right in front of me.

She was white as a ghost, shrouded in diaphanous fabric, and with a thin, pinched face. It was hard to determine her age. She might have been young or old, though her face had no obvious lines.

– Can you help me? I asked her, as soon as I got near enough.

She didn’t seem to hear me – at any rate she didn’t respond. By now I could see that her arms, folded in front like a sleeper, or an Egyptian mummy, were holding a sheaf of papers. As I came up to her, her arms flopped down, releasing the papers like a shower of confetti.

My first instinct was to clutch at them, prevent them from falling. I managed to grab a sheet or two, but when I looked up, she was gone.

That wasn’t the end of the dream, though. It’s hard to convey how desolate and barren that maze of buildings and blind alleys seemed to me – how lost and cold they made me feel. What I saw on the paper in front of me was worse, however.

You see, that was the truly surprising thing about this dream, and about many others I had at this time. Usually, in the past, I’d woken up with vague impressions and a few images from my nightly dream journeys. Sometimes I dreamed of composing long poems, or writing down stories – all that would be left of them in the morning would be (at most) a phrase or a word.

Now, I’d wake up with an almost eidetic memory for details. In this case, for instance, the sheet of paper in my hand was so vividly with me when I woke up from sleep, that I could reproduce it almost line for line, even in the harsh light of morning.

Not that I can draw, you understand. My sketches were crude approximations, scribbled down quickly before the picture could fade. It didn’t fade, though. It was as if it were inscribed on some kind of mental tablet, available there for consultation as I rubbed out and redid the details I’d seen – and still, it seemed, saw.


Image 1 [2]


So what the hell did that mean? It looked like some kind of city map. Or perhaps, given its apparently three-dimensional nature, a subway diagram might be a better analogue.

I couldn’t make head or tail of the directions, or categories, though of course I’d seen such things before in esoteric literature about tarot cards or – for that matter – in W. B. Yeats’s book about the séances he had with his wife.

What did it have to do with me, though? The context made it seem like a map to the streets I’d been trying to find my way through in the dream, but if that was what it was, why was it not a more conventional A-to-Z street grid? I had, after all, been walking around in circles. I hadn’t observed any accessible bridges or tunnels.

And, if it had nothing to do with that, if it was simply a memory of something I’d once seen in a book or a poster, why couldn’t I locate it anywhere? None of the research I did turned up anything particularly analogous, though I did learn quite a bit about the strange, esoteric art of mapping the afterlife.

I guess that most of us are reasonably familiar with the Christian notion of Hell, located below our feet, Earth, here at ground level, and Heaven, up there in the sky. The most thorough conceptualisation of this is probably in Dante’s Divine Comedy, where the whole thing is given a local habitation and a name (or series of names).


Image 2 [3]


You’ll note that Dante has his pilgrim enter hell from a ‘dark wood’ somewhere in the environs of Jerusalem, pursue his way down through the levels to the centre of the earth, where a three-headed Satan sits munching away on the bodies of Brutus, Cassius, and Judas Iscariot, then climb through a tunnel all the way to the antipodes, where Mount Purgatory allows him to climb up through the atmosphere and into the changeless, ethereal realm of the planets.

It’s not, I’m sure, that Dante meant this dream geography to be taken entirely literally (though perhaps he thought some aspects of it might be, in some sense, ‘real’). Subsequent readers and commentators had a less nuanced view, however, and something resembling this is still at the roots of many Christian beliefs.

But there are many other maps and models of the Afterlife!

The oldest one I’m personally aware of is an Egyptian chart of the underworld, showing the subterranean passages your boat of immortality must take before ending up before the judge of souls, who will weigh your heart on a scale against the feather of truth, Ma’at.

If the two balance, you will become the reborn god Osiris; if not, your soul will be devoured by hungry crocodile monsters.


Image 3 [4]


Emanuel Swedenborg, the great scientist turned mystic, had his own model of the afterlife complete with false – and true – heavens, angels, demons, and the rest of the Christian panoply. He claimed, however, to have visited all of these places personally (under angelic protection, obviously) and thus to be authorised to bring back authentic details of their constitution.

There are Mormon models of the Afterlife; Theosophist ones, Buddhist, Taoist and Hindu ones; there’s also the Classical Elysian Fields, with Cerberus, the River Styx, the Asphodels, and Islands of the Blest.

Then there’s the account in Plato’s Republic of the dead man, Er, who came back to life to report his progress through a dark tunnel into a place of judgement where souls are chosen to go on into the light or to go back to earth through reincarnation.

It wasn’t a subject I’d ever paid much attention to previously. I was brought up by two agnostic parents, who duly ‘exposed’ me to services at various churches on the offchance that one of them would take. Unsurprisingly, given the somewhat clinical nature of this procedure, none of them did.

Now, however, my dreamlife seemed to have far more in common with the visionary journeys I was reading about in Swedenborg or Thomas de Quincey than with the more standard anxiety or wish-fulfilment dreams I’d experienced in the past.




I’d grown accustomed by now to the loud creaking noises above my head – in the empty crawlspace our real estate agent had described to us as an ‘attic’ – which ramped up after lights out each evening.

Nor, I’m quite sure, were they solely in my mind. Toby looked up, too, when he heard them, and cuddled up even more closely to my side if (as happened occasionally) they persisted.

Nor could I blame the ever more frequent presence of dead birds around the perimeters of my property on him. He was, by now, too retired and sedentary a hunter to cause such havoc.

They tended to appear during the night, too. I could clearly establish that fact from my new habit of beating the bounds before bed every night.

The property was generally clear of them then. Next morning, though, a couple of melancholy bundles of feathers – mostly blackbirds – were generally to be found.

A fixed opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind.’ So said William Blake.

It was hard for me to formulate any clear opinion on this confusing tangle of events. Was the house haunted? Had it been built near a midden, or a graveyard of some kind? If so, why had these manifestations waited so long to declare themselves?

The inevitable connection with the course of studies I was pursuing was not, of course, entirely absent from my mind. Had my brooding on the subject matter and requirements of the increasingly odd assignments sensitised me somehow to such matters, ‘opened the interior eye’ – as Sheridan Le Fanu warns can happen to those who indulge too much in such unhealthy stimulants as green tea?

It seemed hard to believe, but objectivity was becoming a state of mind increasingly difficult to maintain in the face of such strange (and for me unprecedented) incidents and events.

Then, one morning, the worst thing imaginable happened. Toby was not there beside me when I woke up.

Admittedly, this had – occasionally – occurred previously. Sometimes he needed to go out in the night, and would generally come in with some loud meowing when he heard breakfast preparations beginning inside.

Not this time, though. The long day wore on and he did not appear. He was, of course, wearing a collar with his name and address, and I hoped against hope to receive a call or even a visit about him.

It hadn’t happened for a long time, but certainly in his youth he’d had a bad habit of secreting himself in dark, I suppose to him easily defensible, spaces, some of which turned out to be located in other people’s basements or sheds!

If that had happened again, it might be a day or two before he came home. Which is easy to say, but not so easy to endure.

By the end of the week I’d put flyers on every nearby telegraph pole, knocked on every neighbour’s door. Nothing. I couldn’t help feeling responsible somehow. Everything had seemed fine with him until this spate of uncanny occurrences erupted.

I wondered, too (amazing how the mind wanders) if the fact that I’d written about him, and posted my exercises to the address I’d been given, had somehow opened him up to harm – if, for instance, that had had the effect of making him somehow visible to those who should not have been allowed even to know of his existence?

It seemed a distinctly offbeat conjecture, but could my own writings have contributed in some way to this unparalleled catastrophe?




Does what you write shape, or influence, reality? Does it actually have an ‘objective correlative’ in the physical world? What is the nature of the imagination’s influence on the cosmos?

All I know is that once I started to write about things that go bump in the night, things started to go bump in the night.

Then, when I shifted track to writing about my cat, he started to show classic anxiety symptoms – then went missing altogether.

The King in Yellow. It’s an old book of stories by an obscure American writer called Robert W. Chambers, much admired by H. P. Lovecraft and his circle. The idea of the main narrative is that there’s a book so depraved, so dangerous, that anyone who reads it is irrevocably damned – or driven insane – one of the two, I don’t remember. Possibly both.

We’re never allowed to know just what is so wrong with it, since if we did, presumably the same thing would happen to us …

Could simply signing up for a course, exercising your imagination in unexpected ways, have a similar effect? A rationalist would sneer at so simplistic a notion, and I have to say that it took me some time to get up the courage even to admit to myself that I was beginning to believe it.

But then, in a world where physicists solemnly tell us that no objective phenomenon can be recorded without some influence from the observer – not just Schrödinger's cat or Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, but also the now universally acknowledged contaminating effect of an anthropologist-in-residence on the structures of the ‘primitive’ societies they’re there to examine – it’s hard to maintain that position with any real conviction.

Psychosomatic symptoms are as ‘real’ and ‘significant’ as those caused by bacterial or viral infection – or so the Doctors tell us. Could I somehow be creating the effects I was experiencing simply by expecting them?

It’s hard to observe yourself observing yourself, and yet that’s what such a proposition entails: roughly the mental equivalent of the Red Queen’s setting out to believe seven impossible things before breakfast.

But the problem went deeper than that. It wasn’t my conscious expectations which were really in question – it was the power of the unconscious mind manifesting itself in my everyday reality. The only real alternative to that was to suspend my disbelief in the existence of external spiritual agencies acting upon the world of appearances.

By observing a thing you make it a conscious reality, and thus render moot its ability to affect you subliminally. And yet, if you don’t observe it, you’re left solely with a series of increasingly baffling symptoms. Where’s Sigmund Freud when you really need him? (Though actually, in a case of this kind, it might be more to the point to have Dr. Carl Gustav Jung).

In any case, the dreams continued. The whey-faced woman with the billowing robes – like some figure from a de Quincey opium vision – continued to manifest in the frustrating mazes I explored each night: bombed-out cityscapes; underground sewer-systems; gleaming, ore-heavy caves.

Now, however, I had a friend by my side. Toby the cat had become my Virgil, guiding me through these various labyrinths, though never quite to their heart. He never spoke. Even in dreams, he retained his catitude (to coin a term), had not become some super-cat, some quintessence of felinity. But it’s not hard to read a companion you’ve known for so many years.

I longed to know if he was simply a projection of my sleeping mind. But I suspected it meant he was no longer in the land of the living – that one of the myriad dangers which threaten the safety of the small and powerless had finally caught up with him. I didn’t doubt that he’d faced it with his usual blind courage, paying no heed to the sheer casual power of his adversary, be it machine or animal. I’d seen it many times before, after all – Toby launching himself at an oversized opponent, refusing ever to acknowledge himself outmatched.

I only prayed that he hadn’t been frightened. I tormented myself imagining him meowing for help, the help which had always come in the past, and feeling, in his last moments, betrayed by the one who loved him most.

None of this showed, however, in the sleek presence beside me, darting from shadow to shadow in the relentless underworld of my dreams. I took great comfort from him, but – again – couldn’t but suspect that he was delaying his own onward passage by offering help to me at this darkest of times.




So why not simply give up the course? Admit defeat in these foolish, inflated hopes of finding ‘something to say’ which might appeal to others? ‘Expressing myself’ – in the most banal of ways?

I wasn’t a member of some significant minority or interest group – I had no propagandistic or educational intent. Why, then, bother to speak at all? Les hommes moyen sensuels – more sensual than intellectual, the middle-of-the-road people – already had more than their fair share of mouthpieces.

Easier said than done, I’m afraid. I wrote what I considered a firm but courteous withdrawal letter, and sent it complete with stamped, self-addressed envelope to the PO Box number I’d been given. It was sent back: not known at this address.

Apart from including my letter as an attachment to my latest assignment, there seemed to be no way to subvert this roadblock.

But the letters kept coming from them, regardless of my decision to stop participating in the course. And I kept on dreaming my labyrinthine dreams. And, I was glad to see, not every night but most nights, my furry companion accompanied me, with hints, on occasion, from the woman in white.




I awoke this morning from troubled dreams to find that the house had been broken into during the night.

I hadn’t really thought of myself as a deep sleeper before now, but clearly I must be. I didn’t wake up, despite all the things they took and the amount of time it must have taken them.

It’s not that there was really that much to take: the usual household items, dishes and furniture. All of it was gone this morning, though: just the sink and the light fittings left in the living room. Even the lightbulbs were gone.

There was one stroke of luck, though. I’d been up late leafing through my course materials to date, and had fallen asleep with the folder under my pillow. That was still there, along with all of my writings so far.

Which is really more of an unpleasant irony than a genuine blessing, given my profound doubts about the value of all this introspection. I mean, what good does it do sharing your doubts and fears with a world which has no real interest in you?

A long time ago, when I was still a respectable householder, I purchased a small safe to keep my most valuable possessions secure. It had my passport, birth certificate and other mostly personal items in it. I hadn’t thought of it or used it for quite a long time. It was small enough to fit in one of the upper cupboards.

Sure enough, it was gone, too. Clearly they hadn’t bothered to try to open it on the spot, but had simply carried it out with all the other things.

Besides that, they’d been very neat. The flat now looked as though it belonged to a monk. I wasn’t sure if I didn’t prefer it that way, to be honest. Just a scattering of sand over the floor where they’d tromped in and out.

At first I wondered why so much sand, then remembered the plant boxes outside – another relic of that far-off period of domesticity.

When I rang the police, they were politely non-committal. There’d be an officer around in ‘due course,’ they claimed – though it sounded as if that was unlikely to be in the next couple of hours. Or days, for that matter.

– You have to remember that we have quite a lot on our plate nowadays, the operator reminded me. It’s not that we don’t take your crime extremely seriously, but it may take rather longer than we would like to come round and take your statement.

Which reminded me that all of my insurance documents were in the safe, too.

Not to mention my photo albums, old letters, and other mementoes.

When I came to think of it, I hadn’t really been out of the flat for some weeks now. I used to take regular walks round the park, but some rough characters had taken to hanging around by the wooded edges of the football field, and they were prone to call out and make rude gestures whenever I walked by.

Nor, in my retired state, could I afford a car any more.

Had I actually become a shut-in? I mean, I never actually had that conversation with my ‘cousin’ I started off these notes with – it was all imaginary. I hadn’t seen him for ages. Had he simply stopped visiting without me noticing?

The second strange thing took place later that day, in the early evening.

A knock came at the door. I rushed over to open it, convinced that it was the police come at last. Not that I exactly relished admitting to them just how lax my security had been – how hopeless any prospect of recovering the thieves’ takings. But it would be some kind of human contact: some acknowledgement of my sacred right to breathe in air and occupy some small part of our planet.

But it wasn’t them. Instead, it was an efficient-looking young woman, with a clipboard in her arms, and the determined expression of a practised knocker-on-doors.

– Yes? I asked. A bit curt, I suppose, but it was a bit of a surprise.
– You’ve experienced a break-in?
– Yes, I have. Are you with the police?
– Not directly, no. But we do work with them.
– You’d better come in, then.
– Thank you. I’d be delighted.

That seemed to strike a bit of an odd note. Was I letting in trouble? Memories of all those books and movies where inviting someone to cross your threshold gave them free entry thereafter crossed the back of my mind. Only to be rejected summarily. Not someone so neat and prosaic as this young lady!

– I’m afraid that there’s really nowhere to sit. You see, they took most of my furniture. There’s a chair in the bedroom, that’s all.
– That’s fine. I’m happy to stand.
– Would you like a glass of water? The faucet still runs, and I still have a couple of cups.
– Yes, thank you, that would be lovely. It’s rather dry and hot out there.

And so it was. As I looked out the window, I could see just how bad the drought had been this year. The grass was dry straw, and the exposed earth on the verges was crumbling to dust.

– We could certainly do with some rain.
– But there won’t be any.
– Excuse me?
– I mean that it will stay hot and dry out there just as long as you’re here.
– I don’t understand. Do you mean that you think I’m causing it somehow?
– Isn’t that what you think? That’s what it says here, anyway.
– That’s what it says where?
– In my notes on your case.
– My case. What case?
– Your burglary.
– Oh, I see. Did I say that to the lady on the phone? I don’t remember doing that, I must admit.
– You didn’t say it, but you have been toying with the idea: that what you think changes what happens to you.
– How on earth could you know that? Just who are you, anyway? You’re not with the police!
– I never said I was.
– You said that you were connected with them, though.
– Did I? I don’t think so. I think I said that we work with them: specifically, that we pool information from time to time.
– You mean they’re just giving out information to any Tom, Dick or Harry?
– If you like, yes. That’s exactly what they’re doing. And in exchange, we’re sharing our own information with them.
– I think you’d better leave.
– Can I finish my glass of water?
– No, I think you’d better just go.
– That could be unwise. I have things to tell you which you really need to know at this stage in the process.
– I’m not interested in anything you could have to say to me. When the police do come I’m going to make it pretty clear just what I think of them sharing my data with some neighbourhood group.
– But that’s just the point ...
– Just leave!

And so she did, ostentatiously finishing her water first, then looking around for somewhere to put it down, then finally sidling out the front door with a slightly regretful look on her face.

I was all prepared for a smirk: the usual expression of the young and attractive in any interaction with the old and poor. But I couldn’t persuade myself that I’d seen one. It was twilight by now, and she seemed to evaporate into the shadows the moment she’d gone out the door.

Leaving me to an evening of futile regrets. Why hadn’t I agreed to hear her out? It mightn’t have taken long, and I could have got some real clues as to what was actually happening to me. Was she somehow connected to the writing course? How else could she have known about my suspicions about how directly my thoughts were influencing the world around me? It was not the kind of idea you share with people you don’t know, and even in the state of agitation I’d been in at the time, I couldn’t imagine myself mentioning it to the police receptionist who answered my phone call.

But I hadn’t been agitated. That was the point. I should have been, but I wasn’t. It all seemed inevitable somehow. As if I’d simply been waiting for it to happen – and accepted it as the next step in the process as soon as it did.




My dream last night was far less spectacular than some of the Piranesi cityscapes I’ve been wandering through over the past couple of weeks. It was almost as if the damage had now been done: whatever bewilderment they were meant to accomplish (the ‘dreamwork’ – as Freud calls it) had finally achieved its intended results.

My memory of it seemed clearer this morning when I woke up, too – not the usual sense of clouds of imagery and intertwined narratives fading away like fog when the sun rises.

I was lying on some kind of hospital bed in a vast, echoing space. I couldn’t really see anything, but my position there was not uncomfortable. There was a certain feeling of dread in the pit of my stomach, though.

After a while, I began to become conscious of some voices talking nearby. They’d been doing so for some time before I started to focus in on the fact that I could hear at least some of what they were saying. It sounded a bit like one of those highbrow radio programmes which broadcast dialogues between the great and the famous on stereotyped issues of the day.

It’s hard to be precise, but there seemed to be two main voices, with another one playing the role of a compère or referee. Again, it sounded like a public debate of some kind, only this one seemed more intimate than that: like a conversation between close colleagues where much of what is actually meant is conveyed by small shifts in tone or choice of words.

I don’t know how long it went on for. It didn’t really appear to have been resolved when I woke up – but then, I may have missed the most important portions. Nor am I really sure if I was meant to overhear it at all.

What I can remember went something like this:

Voice 1: ... in that case, we may have to resort to more radical action.
Voice 2: Really? Isn’t that a little premature?

[My impression of these two voices is that the first sounded harsher and more masculine than the other. The second, I concluded after a while, might well have belonged to the young woman who had visited me to discuss my ‘case’, and whom I’d so rudely, in retrospect, dismissed. Whether it was or wasn’t her, it certainly seemed more placatory and forgiving than the first one].

V1: Hardly premature. We’ve allowed a most elaborate build-up of shadow realities around him. Nor have we emphasised the contradictions underlying his continued residence.
V2: But it’s strange to him still. It’s natural for him to bolster up a sense of self with virtual props.

[‘Him’, I assumed, was me. Of course I could have been wrong, but it just seemed unlikely that anyone else’s ‘case’ was likely to be under discussion under such carefully staged circumstances].

V2: [continuing]: After all, we haven’t really tried to break through and actually talk with him.
Another Voice: Except for your visit.
V2: Yes, but that could hardly have been expected to resolve the deadlock. It was understandable that he would maintain the circumstances of the fiction we’ve allowed him to sustain.
V1: I’m opposed to such fictions in general – particularly in cases like these. What can one make of a mind who can actually type out citations from Swedenborg, and still refuse to acknowledge their application to his own case?
V2: That it’s a normal human mind, shielded against realities which might have blasted it at birth?
V1: Shielding can only go so far. At a certain point harsher consequences are bound to break through, and I’ve never believed that delays with that can do any good. In any case, we’ve tried it your way, and the results have been largely discouraging.
V2: I don’t see that at all. Analysis of the notes shows larger recognitions on the point of taking form at any moment. How could anyone conceive of such narrative excursuses who wasn’t aware, on some level, of their underlying validity?
V1: What you see as encouraging I see as evasive. The point at issue now is what to do next. The sands have started to leak in and the building is under threat. The bolstering presences have all been withdrawn, one by one. Exiling him from these props is the next logical development.
V2: I don’t see that as inevitable at all. Yes, his friend the cat has gone, Our Lady of Sorrows has tried in vain to lead him out of the maze, but there is one last trope we haven’t tried yet.
Other Voice: Which is?
V2: I think you know.
V1: I’m not sure I do.
V2: The loop.
Other Voice: That is radical.
V2: But not untried. And not always unsuccessful where it has been tried.
V1: Acknowledged. I hadn’t thought it necessary in so simple a case as this, but apparently you can see more in him than I do.
V2: I’m not sure I do, and I’m not sure I’m doing him any favours by proposing this, but I agree that otherwise exile is the only alternative. And I’d just as soon avoid that.
V1: To keep up your numbers?
Other Voice: That was unkind.
V1: I’m sorry, I withdraw that last remark with apologies.
V2: Already forgotten.

Voice 1: ... in that case, we may have to resort to more radical action. Voice 2: Really? Isn’t that a little premature?

I think at this point I attempted to break in. To claim at least some part in the conversation – to assert my right to participate in something which sounded so final, and as if it affected me in particular.

At any rate I remember trying to sit up and speak, but in vain. If this was a kind of sleep paralysis, it was beyond my powers to break through it. And so I woke up with a pounding headache and a sense of doom.

Later that morning I sat down and wrote out the above. To be honest, it wasn’t really like writing. A kind of hole in my vision appeared, and I found myself describing the voices I’d overheard.

It’s recognisably in my style, but that is not my usual process for writing. I wondered, in fact, if it constituted some kind of a breakthrough for me. In any case, the strong emotions the dream had given rise to consumed me as I attempted to put it down on paper, and remained long after the writing itself was concluded.




– Have you had time to reconsider?

I’d been sitting out in the open for some time, watching her approach slowly from the immeasurable distance. Far off there was a line of mountains, but immediately in front of me was an arid plain – dusty, barren, and with only occasional interruptions of yellow-green shrubs and cacti.

It wasn’t anywhere I knew well, but then it was hard to say just what I did know well. This desert landscape seemed extracted from the quintessence of innumerable Westerns – The Searchers, and other movies by John Ford, in particular – though it did bear a slight resemblance, too, to my memories of the Volcanic Plateau.

That was criss-crossed with ditches and rough spots, though, and this was far flatter.

Wherever I was, then, it wasn’t there.

Which made her appearance even more inexplicable. Well-dressed, in an office power-suit kind of way, her black hair tied back in a tight bun.

Wherever she belonged, it wasn’t here.

I, by contrast, was in a dusty old shirt and jeans. I couldn’t remember putting them on, but then I couldn’t remember anything much from before.

Which made her first words to me so inexplicable.

– Would you like a cup of water? I replied, at length. I could see that the reason I’d ended up here was that there was a standing pipe with a watering trough attached to it. I seemed to be holding a cup, too: an old china cup marked with a railway logo.
– No, thank you. I won’t be here long. Have you had time to think about my question?
– Whether or not I’ve reconsidered? I guess so. I’m just not quite sure what it is I need to reconsider.
– Why you’re here, for one thing. Or rather, why you think that you’re here.
– Either I’m here or I’m not, surely? And if I am here, I certainly don’t know why.
– Oh, I think you do.

Which brought it all back. The little house – so like, yet really rather unlike – my own small house in the suburbs. My writing ambitions. The argument with my brother – sorry, my cousin, was it, I made him into? The dreams, the cat, Marguerite ... The whole kit and kaboodle.

– You’re the lady who came to the house.
– Just so.
– And I sent you away.
– You did. Have you had time to reconsider?
– If you mean, do I regret sending you away without hearing you out, then I certainly do. I’m not sure what’s going on here, but if you do, I’d be very grateful to hear it.
– Do you think that this is a dream?
– Well, I guess that it must be. It’s not the oddest dream I’ve had lately, that’s for sure.
– But does it feel like a dream?

She had me there. It certainly didn’t. It felt both real and unreal at the same time. In reality, if I’d come to on some dry floodplain, wearing clothes I couldn’t remember putting on, talking to a woman who came out of nowhere, I’d have been incoherent with shock. But on some level, I could see that this was no realer or less real than all the rest of it – the house, the job, the life.

– Let’s put it another way. Do you remember what you did?
– How do you mean what I did? I’ve done tons of things. I certainly regret some of them.
– The main one. D’you remember doing it? Why you did it? How?
– Yes.

And at that moment I did remember. All the thinking, all those violent thoughts – the weariness of it all. The moment of decision.

– Would you do it again?
– I’m not sure. I’m being honest here. I’d like to say no, but the truth is I’m not sure. It got pretty bad in here (tapping my head). You know.
– I know.
– Is that what all of this is about? Showing me how wrong I was, how if I’d hung on for one more day everything would have come right, that I would have prevailed?
– No. It’s not about anything, really. It’s just what you built for yourself as a place to come to. It may seem like a series of places, but you can see now that they all fold into one.
– So what should I do? I can’t go back, can I? You can’t do that for me, give me those minutes back, like in a time-travel movie, so I can try out a different choice?
– No.
– Are you just here to torment me, then?
– If you like. If that’s how you see me.

All of a sudden her face contorted into a sneer. Little horns poked up behind her ears, and a dark wind swirled around us.

– So I’m in hell. Is that it?
– Yes. If you want it to be.
– But I don’t want it to be. I don’t want to stay like this, going round and round the same things like a rat in a maze, unable to do or say anything that matters.
– What would you rather it was?
– You mean I can choose? I can make this anything I like? Transform it into a rather dry version of heaven? Or purgatory?
– I mean, what would you rather it was?
– I guess I’m not ready for Heaven. I’d rather it were Purgatory, then, I suppose. I’d rather I was learning something, learning how not to be like this all the time.
– Good to know.
– Is that it, then? You’re not going to wave your magic wand and turn it all into the foothills of Mt. Purgatory in the Antipodes, start me off on my journey up the hill to the terrestrial paradise?
– You know, you can be quite witty sometimes. It’s one of the things that’s held you back, that cynicism of yours, but it’s also one of your saving graces.
– So that’s it, then? This is purgatory?
– No.
– No?
– No more than it’s hell or heaven. It’s the last dying moments of an organism devoted to sight and sound, desperately improvising more dreamworlds to stave off the end of oxygen starvation.
– So it’s all pointless, then? You’re not here, I’m not here. The only thing that’s actually real is me with a noose round my neck?
– If you like.
– But I don’t like. I just told you that. And I heard your conversation with those other spirits. You were on my side then.
– Was I?
– I thought so, yes. Now I’m not quite so sure.
– Perhaps I’m just a messenger. Perhaps I don’t really make the executive decisions.
– A messenger from whom?
Whom. Good one. Important to keep your grammar straight right till the end. A messenger from you, of course.
– From me? But I’m here.
– Part of you is, yes, but maybe not all. Maybe there’s other parts of you as well.
– You mean parts in the past? Or versions of me in other paths in the universe?
– Whichever one you prefer.
– Can I stop all this, do you mean?
– I think so, yes. But do you really want to?
– Of course I do.
– Even though you don’t have the faintest idea where you’re going? Whether there’ll still be a you when it stops? Are you really ready for that?
– Um.
– I thought not. Sorry.
– No, wait! I just had to think for a second. Yes, of course I’m ready for that, ready to stop all of this, ready to go anywhere I should go, ready ...




What do you write in one of these, anyway? In the movies they always ask, ‘Did he leave a note?’ so I suppose that I should. It seems to arouse suspicion if the answer’s ‘no.’

It’s been much worse lately. I’ve been lying awake most of the night, trying to get off the treadmill, but round and round it goes: you’re useless, you’re a waste of space, you’ve never done anything good, or anything at all, really, and so on and so on and so on.

O the mind, mind has mountains, cliffs of fall – a quotation for every occasion, that’s me.

The only thing I could find to quiet it all down and give me a bit of piece was imagining a noose. Yes, I’d visualise tying it, attaching it to some sturdy hook in the ceiling, adjusting it round my neck, and – bing! – game over.

It seemed like a
hopeful thing, really – a door marked EXIT in the middle of an exceptionally tiresome family reunion.

Do I regret doing it? Well, I haven’t done it yet – otherwise I wouldn’t be writing this.
Q.E.D. Maybe I’ll have second thoughts. Maybe I’ll erase all this bullshit. Maybe there’s no point in any of this.

I’m very very sorry if this causes any pain to anyone. It’s hard to see how it would, but they always say that it’s hardest on the ones left behind. I doubt that’ll be the case here, and I’m definitely, sincerely not doing this to have the last word, or to try and make any of you feel sorry for me, regret that you weren’t nicer to me when I was alive.

Yes, it has that posthumous feel to it, already. It’s not your fault. If it’s anyone’s fault, it’s mine, of course, but I’m not sure if even that is true.
Nobody’s Fault. Isn’t that a novel by someone? Probably. I would have gone and looked it up in my previous existence. Wilkie Collins, maybe? I’ll never know, because I’m not going to look it up, and I won’t be here to wonder for much longer.

Sorry, sorry, sorry. Anyone who finds this is welcome to destroy it if you don’t find it …
constructive exactly.

But then, cut me some slack, Jack. I’m not in my right mind, after all. By definition. What better proof do you need?

I’m glad, in a way, that Toby isn’t here to live through this. That wasn’t the thing that pushed me over, either, though of course it didn’t help. But I won’t have to ask anyone to look after him and brush his fur and put up with all his little ways.

The rest of you can fend for yourselves. I hope you do a far better job of it than I was able to manage. I’m sure you all will. Sayonara, suckers.

Sorry. I really am sorry. But that’s enough.


Love (or what you will)




There’s a very big difference between a metaphorical mountain and the real thing. Birds’-eye views of majestic landscapes flashing by are just so utterly unlike putting each foot down one after the other on a rocky, ill-defined trail.

Mountain streams, too. They look so innocuous, but the sheer shock of the cold when you plunge into one, not to mention the strength of the current, always combines to take you by surprise.

‘Twenty minutes to the hut’ means more than two hours humping a heavy pack over rough ground, crossing and re-crossing the same stream as you work your way up the glacial moraine, only to find a rough wooden structure already packed to the rafters with other overnight visitors.

You find you can’t even go inside – there’s such a squirming multitude of people in there – although you know that sooner or later, when dark falls, you’ll have to. There are some biscuits and other snacks in your pack, and you can chew on those rather than try to heat up anything in the minuscule kitchen.

It’s only the beginning, of course. Perhaps it’s because such hikes are so little to your taste that you’ve found yourself here. A long sea voyage, with its enforced inactivity, would probably suit you better. But the constant sense of queasiness at the ship’s motion might make that even more unendurable.

So it goes on, day after day. Different landscapes, different tracks, crowded huts, and only the slightest sense of the distant mountains coming nearer.

Sometimes it rains – for weeks at a time, you feel – so you have to get used to never being quite dry. To water penetrating every last fold of your clothes (and your canvas pack, too).

But still you go on. There’s nothing else to do except sit down and rest. Which you do do, frequently. Less frequently as the days and weeks go by and mount into months. For all that means. There’s no choice. Or, rather, there is, but it must have been taken some time back, sometime in the distant, inaccessible past.

You have no companions on the way, but at times you sense that there might be others – just visible out of the corner of the eye, grey figures, cloudy impressions, marching at the edge of sight.

And there may be creatures out there, too. Not the vast shadowy beasts that hunt you still in your dreams, but something smaller, more comforting. You’re almost sure you’ve felt a small flank pressed up against you at night. A little cat, perhaps.

If they’re there, they’re there. The way’s the way, and that’s an end of it. Your long walk continues, and you find, above all, that you’re grateful for the pain of it: the feeling of those sharp stones that bruise you even through the soles of your boots, the thorns that get caught in your skin, the sweat trickling down as the slopes become steeper, the glare of the sun in the sky.




[Editor’s note: The original draft of this story included a number of interleaved, loose-leaf pages which appear to have been intended as the ‘course’ texts referred to in the narrative. They were taken from, respectively:
  • An Adventure, by Charlotte Anne Moberly and Eleanor Jourdain (1911)
  • Phantasms of the Living, by Frederic Myers, Edmund Gurney, & Frank Podmore (1886)
  • Arcana Coelestia, by Emanuel Swedenborg (1749-1756)
  • The Astral Plane, by C. A. Ledbetter (1895)

I’ve included them all here, in case there is some further function they were intended to serve in the narrative. – M. S. (20/9/23)]:





Sample Text I:
Friends

After some days of sight-seeing in Paris, to which we were almost strangers, on an August afternoon, 1901, Miss Lamont and I went to Versailles. We had very hazy ideas as to where it was or what there was to be seen. Both of us thought it might prove to be a dull expedition. We went by train, and walked through the rooms and galleries of the Palace with interest, though we constantly regretted our inability through ignorance to feel properly the charm of the place. ....
We sat down in the Salle des Glaces, where a very sweet air was blowing in at the open windows over the flower-beds below, and finding that there was time to spare, I suggested our going to the Petit Trianon. My sole knowledge of it was from a magazine article read as a girl, from which I received a general impression that it was a farmhouse where the Queen had amused herself.
Looking in Baedeker's map we saw the sort of direction and that there were two Trianons, and set off. By not asking the way we went an unnecessarily long way round, – by the great flights of steps from the fountains and down the central avenue as far as the head of the long pond. The weather had been very hot all the week, but on this day the sky was a little overcast and the sun shaded. There was a lively wind blowing, the woods were looking their best, and we both felt particularly vigorous. It was a most enjoyable walk. …

On the way back to Paris the setting sun at last burst out from under the clouds, bathing the distant Versailles woods in glowing light, – Valerien standing out in front a mass of deep purple. ...
For a whole week we never alluded to that afternoon, nor did I think about it until I began writing a descriptive letter of our expeditions of the week before. As the scenes came back one by one, the same sensation of dreamy unnatural oppression came over me so strongly that I stopped writing, and said to Miss Lamont, ‘ Do you think that the Petit Trianon is haunted.’ Her answer was prompt, ‘Yes, I do.’ [5]




Sample Text II:
Dialogue

February 18th.

Who are you that writes, and has told all you know?
A.Wife.
But does no one tell wife what to write? If so, who?
A.Spirit.
Whose spirit?
A.Wife’s brain.
But how does wife’s brain know (certain) secrets?
A.Wife’s spirit unconsciously guides.
But how does wife’s spirit know things it has never been told?
A.No external influence.
But by what internal influence does it know (these) secrets?
A.You cannot know.

March 15th.

Who, then, makes the impressions upon her?
A.Many strange things.
What sort of strange things?
A.Things beyond your knowledge.
Do, then, things beyond our knowledge make impressions upon wife?
A.Influences which no man understands or knows.
Are these influences which we cannot understand external to wife?
A.External – invisible.
Does a spirit, or do spirits, exercise those influences?
A.No, never (written very large and emphatically.)
Then from whom, or from whence, do the external influences come?
A.Yes; you will never know.
What do you mean by writing ‘yes’ in the last answer?
A.That I really meant never.

– Devonport, 1871 [6]




Sample Text III:
Anecdote

The angels told me that when Melancthon died he was provided with a house deceptively like the one in which he lived in this world. (This happens to most newcomers in eternity upon their first arrival – it is why they are ignorant of their death, and think they are still in the natural world.) All the things in his room were similar to those he had had before – the table, the desk with its drawers, the shelves of books. As soon as Melancthon awoke in this new abode, he sat at his table, took up his literary work, and spent several days writing – as usual – on justification by faith alone, without so much as a single word on charity. This omission being remarked by the angels, they sent messengers to question him. ‘I have proved beyond refutation,’ Melancthon replied to them, ‘that there is nothing in charity essential to the soul, and that to gain salvation faith is enough.’ He spoke with great assurance, unsuspecting that he was dead and that his lot lay outside Heaven. When the angels heard him say these things, they departed.
After a few weeks, the furnishings in his room began to fade away and disappear, until at last there was nothing left but the armchair, the table, the paper, and his inkstand. What is more, the walls of the room became encrusted with lime, and the floor with a yellow glaze. Melancthon’s own clothes were now much coarser. He wondered at these changes, but he went on writing about faith while denying charity, and was so persistent in this exclusion that he was suddenly transported underground to a kind of workhouse, where there were other theologians like him. Locked up for a few days, Melancthon fell to doubting his doctrine, and was allowed to return to his former room. ...
It was at this point that he decided to write something concerning charity. The only difficulty was that what he wrote one day he could not see the next. This was because the pages had been written without conviction. Melancthon received many visits from persons newly dead, but he felt shame at being found in so run-down a lodging. In order to have them believe he was in Heaven, he hired a neighbouring magician, who tricked the company with appearances of peace and splendour. The moment his visitors had gone – and sometimes a little before – these adornments vanished, leaving the former plaster and draughtiness. The last I heard of Melancthon was that the magician and one of the faceless men had taken him away into the sand hills, where he is now a kind of servant of demons. [7]




Sample Text IV:
Adjustment

So abundant and so manifold is this life of the astral plane that at first it is absolutely bewildering to the neophyte; and even for the more practised investigator it is no easy task to attempt to classify and to catalogue it. If the explorer of some unknown tropical forest were asked not only to give a full account of the country through which he had passed, with accurate details of its vegetable and mineral productions, but also to state the genus and species of every one of the myriad insects, birds, beasts, and reptiles which he had seen, he might well shrink appalled at the magnitude of the undertaking: yet even this affords no parallel to the embarrassments of the psychic investigator, for in his case matters are further complicated, first by the difficulty of correctly translating from that plane to this the recollection of what he has seen, and secondly by the utter inadequacy of ordinary language to express much of what he has to report. However, just as the explorer on the physical plane would probably commence his account of a country by some sort of general description of its scenery and characteristics, so it will be well to begin this slight sketch of the astral plane by endeavouring to give some idea of the scenery which forms the background of its marvellous and ever-changing activities. Yet here at the outset an almost insuperable difficulty confronts us in the extreme complexity of the matter. All who see fully on that plane agree that to attempt to call up before those whose eyes are as yet unopened a vivid picture of this astral scenery is like speaking to a blind man of the exquisite variety of tints in a sunset sky – however detailed and elaborate the description may be, there is no certainty that the idea presented before the hearer's mind will be an adequate representation of the truth. [8]




Notes:

[1] Ezra Pound, 'Canto LXXIV'. The Cantos of Ezra Pound. 1970. NDP 824 (New York: New Directions Publishing Corporation, 1996), 445.

[2] Image by Daniela Gast & Rowan Johnson, after stevebwriter, 'The Cube of Space' (16/11/12). [https://www.flickr.com/photos/wackystuff/8190924514].

[3] Image by Daniela Gast & Rowan Johnson, after David Lafferty, ‘Maps of Dante’s Afterlife’ (7/2/14). [http://dwlafferty.blogspot.com/2014/02/maps-of-dantes-inferno.html].

[4] Image by Daniela Gast & Rowan Johnson, after Harry Pettit, ‘Raising Hell: Ancient Egyptian coffin contains “oldest map of the underworld” inscribed 4,000 years ago.’ (8/10/19). [https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/10090139/ancient-egypt-coffin-map-underworld/].

[5] Anon [Anne Moberly & Eleanor Jourdain]. An Adventure. 1911. Preface by Edith Olivier. Note by J. W. Dunne (London: Faber, 1937), 43-44 & 50.

[6] Frederic Myers, Edmund Gurney, & Frank Podmore, Phantasms of the Living. 2 vols (1886). [https://www.esalen.org/ctr-archive/book-phantasms.html#readme].

[7] Emanuel Swedenborg, Arcana Coelestia (1749-1756). [http://biblio3.url.edu.gt/Libros/borges/infamia.pdf].

[8] C. A. Ledbetter, The Astral Plane (1895). [https://www.forgottenbooks.com/en/books/TheAstralPlane_10001602].




Jack Ross: Haunts (2024)


[16-29/1; 13-15/4/22-20/9/23]

[16,916 words]

[Published in Haunts (2024)]